X (2022) Review – A Highly Stylish But Narratively Thin 70s Slasher Throwback
X: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A technically brilliant and visually arresting homage to the exploitation era that unfortunately prioritises style over narrative depth. X succeeds in capturing the gritty, sun-drenched aesthetic of the late 70s, propped up by a fantastic score and a committed dual performance from Mia Goth. However, the film suffers from a lethargic first hour that fails to build meaningful tension or develop its characters beyond their basic archetypes. While the final act delivers a straight sprint of gore and psycho-biddy horror, the extreme predictability and constant meta-winks to the camera prevent it from becoming the modern classic its fans claim it to be. A solid 3.2-star effort that is well worth watching for its atmosphere, even if the story is ultimately paper-thin.
Details: Director: Ti West | Cast: Mia Goth, Jenna Ortega, Brittany Snow, Kid Cudi, Martin Henderson | Runtime: 1h 45m | Release Date: 18 March 2022
Best for: Fans of 70s slasher aesthetics, viewers who enjoy “style-over-substance” cinema, and Mia Goth enthusiasts.
Worth noting: The film was shot in secret back-to-back with its prequel, Pearl, in New Zealand during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Where to Watch: Amazon🛒
Rating: 3.2/5 Stars
(Superb 70s aesthetic, strong acting, thin and predictable plot)
Welcome to Knockout Horror and to our review of Ti West’s X from 2022. Obviously this movie is a couple of years old now. The prequel, Pearl, has already released and MaXXXine is in the cinema as we speak. I haven’t checked out any of these movies so I figured it was about time we caught up on the entire X movie series. You can check out our review of Pearl by following the link. Spoiler alert, it was a lot more positive than this one. And you can also take a look at our MaXXXine review right here.
Table of Contents
A lot of hype for this movie
X follows the story of an adult film making team heading out to the middle of nowhere to shoot a movie. After renting a house on the property of an elderly couple, the team get to shooting. The only problem is, they didn’t tell the owners of the house the reason for why they are renting it. And when they find out, they are going to be less than pleased.
I went into this movie with a fair bit of excitement. I’ll preface this by saying that I don’t think the name Ti West being attached to a movie is any reason to get too excited. I mean, he made The Innkeepers which I enjoyed and The House of the Devil which was a fun bit of style over substance. But as far as his horror movies go, he is, generally, batting fairly average.
A lot of people hated The Innkeepers. It was very much a movie made for, and by, Millennials and it seems that everyone outside of that group doesn’t really get it. It is quite “random” in parts, after all. The Sacrament was okay, I suppose. The House of the Devil is watchable but I also can’t forget that he is responsible for the shockingly poor Cabin Fever 2, the second worst segment in V/H/S and, potentially, the worst segment in ABCs of Death. The less said about his earlier efforts and his collection of shorts the better.
So Ti West was the least of my reasons to be excited about X and its follow ups. It was the interesting late 70s style, decent cast and Mia Goth that had me highly anticipating this film. How long has it been since we had some good old fashioned psycho-biddy horror as well?
An ode to a classic horror era
Despite the above elements that had me hyped being present and accounted for, I didn’t find myself enjoying this movie a whole lot. It really didn’t do much for me aside from confirm that there are a few things about Ti West’s filmmaking that I just don’t vibe with. Let’s talk about the positives first because, to be fair, there are quite a few of them.
X is an ode to late 70s horror and the influences are very clear. This is a love letter to Tobe Hooper and, in that respect, West has absolutely nailed it. Just like he did in The House of the Devil; West has created a movie that you could genuinely believe was dragged right out of that era.
“X is an ode to late 70s horror and the influences are very clear. This is a love letter to Tobe Hooper.”
Despite being filmed in the more modern 1.90:1 widescreen aspect ratio, there is enough grain and dirt to make the visuals fit with the era.
Technically well made
Clothing, set design and makeup all feel accurate to the era. Tyler Bates and Chelsea Wolfe’s score is fantastic, a real highlight of the film. There’s a gritty orange hue bathing every scene and there is shot after shot of authentic exploitation horror goodness.
Dozens of references to movies like Psycho, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre and other classics litter the movie. And the whole thing feels like a real ode to what made horror of that generation so damn good. This feels every part like a movie that would have been made in the 70s as a form of rebellion against the buttoned up, stuffy, norms of everyday life. Throw in a decent amount of gore and you have a good foundation for a horror movie.
I, obviously, have to mention the acting. Mia Goth is playing a dual role as both the adult film star Maxine and the old lady Pearl. She does fantastic, for the most part, though her accent slips pretty often, especially when she is playing Pearl. The addition of old age to her voice made her almost indiscernible at points. Though sound production, as a whole, is a major weak point of the movie. Jenna Ortega is okay in a rather understated role. Would You Rather‘s Brittany Snow was a lot of fun as Bobby-Lynne and Martin Henderson is a real highlight as Wayne. I felt like Kid Cudi was the weakest cast member, sounding a bit wooden in parts.
What I didn’t like
I can never shake the feeling that many of Ti West’s films are short movies stretched like taffy into feature length presentations. There is just so much preamble and bullshit leading up to the actual horror. It was the same in The House of the Devil and The Innkeepers, though The Innkeepers doesn’t suffer as much because Sara Paxton’s character is so likeable.
“I can never shake the feeling that many of Ti West’s films are short movies stretched like taffy into feature length presentations.”
I am not taking shots at a horror movie having a story. I am a huge fan of slow paced, story heavy, horror. It’s just that the story here is so thin on the ground. West manages to drag out a bunch of adult film stars making an adult film into a one hour ordeal. There is very little else going on in that time frame. The antagonist’s motivations aren’t being established. We are going to need a prequel for that. Characters aren’t being developed and tension isn’t being built. It is one hour of nothing.
The action doesn’t start until we are 60 minutes in and then it is a straight sprint to the finish. When you throw in West’s constant winking at the camera and over dependence on copious amounts of needles exposition, it gets a bit tiring. It wouldn’t be so bad if everything wasn’t so damn predictable.
Every kill is projected from miles away. They aren’t all that creative and they really aren’t particularly shocking, either. The shock value, altogether, in X is very much of a teen-appropriate level. Awkward sex scenes, a few pairs of tits here and there and a dong shrouded in shadow. It’s all fairly insignificant and nowhere near as shocking as actual exploitation movies from the era.
Style over substance
Certain scenes made me physically cringe. West is cheesy to an almost painful degree. A certain scene towards the end accompanied by a voice on the television shouting “Divine Intervention” was pretty awful. But when followed later by the quote “Well, by the looks of everythin’, I’d say one goddamn f****d up horror picture.” in reference to a recovered video tape, I nearly passed out from how hard my eyes rolled.
“It was, in traditional Ti West style, an hour of boring story for thirty minutes of uninspired and predictable kills.”
It’s bad enough that West feels the need to constantly foreshadow every event and explain every little last thing without all the awkward winks to the camera.
I just don’t get the hype. I really wanted to but I just don’t get it. Sure, the movie is fantastically stylish and technically brilliantly made. But, beneath that veneer, this is just another formulaic horror movie with some fairly dull kills, a paper thin plot and far too much exposition.
Interestingly enough, the release of MaXXXine has sparked renewed interest in X. And my fiancée spotted a few people discussing it on the horror reddit. Someone there had the temerity to say they didn’t enjoy it and were immediately met with downvotes galore. Classic, prime Reddit right there. You are allowed an opinion unless it is different from the one decided on by the echo chamber. What a disappointment but definitely not a surprise.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Aesthetics: West masterfully recreates the look and feel of 1979 horror, from the gritty colour grading to the authentic period costuming.
- Mia Goth: Delivers a powerhouse performance in two vastly different roles, anchoring the film even when the script falters.
- The Score: Tyler Bates and Chelsea Wolfe provide an atmospheric and haunting backdrop that perfectly complements the visuals.
The Bad
- Pacing: The film takes an hour to get to the point, with a first act that feels bloated and over-indulgent.
- Predictability: Genre veterans will see every kill and plot beat coming from a mile off, draining the tension from the final act.
- Thin Narrative: Beyond the initial premise, there is very little story or character development to keep the viewer invested.
The Ugly: The “Meta” Cringe. Ti West’s constant winks at the audience and heavy-handed foreshadowing often feel self-satisfied and distracting.
Should You Watch X?
If you love the visual language of 70s horror, then yes, it is worth a look for the technical craft alone. However, if you are looking for a slasher with genuine surprises or a tight, compelling narrative, you might find X to be a case of style over substance that doesn’t quite live up to its massive reputation.
You might also like:
- Inside (2007) Review – A Visceral and Brutal Festive Nightmare
- Blood (2022) Review – A Bloodless and Laborious Parent Trap
- Annabelle Comes Home (2019) Review – A Spooky, Fun-Filled Carnival Ride
- Unfriended: Dark Web (2018) Review – A Sinister and High-Stakes Sequel
- Pet Sematary (1989) Review – A Classic Melancholic Monkey’s Paw Tale
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.











