Pearl (2022) Review – A Masterful And Technicolor Descent Into Madness
Pearl: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A stunning, vibrant, and deeply unsettling character study that easily surpasses its predecessor in depth and technical execution. Pearl is a masterclass in atmospheric horror, trading the derivative slasher tropes of X for a sophisticated homage to the Golden Age of Hollywood. Mia Goth delivers a transformative performance that is nothing short of legendary, culminating in a final monologue that will be studied by horror fans for decades. While its deliberate pace and stylised aesthetic might alienate those seeking a traditional high-body-count slasher, it is a much more rewarding experience for those who appreciate character-driven terror. A 4-star triumph that proves the Ti West and Mia Goth collaboration is one of the most vital forces in modern horror.
Details: Director: Ti West | Cast: Mia Goth, David Corenswet, Tandi Wright, Matthew Sunderland | Runtime: 1h 43m | Release Date: 16 September 2022
Best for: Fans of psychological character studies, lovers of vintage cinema aesthetics, and anyone who appreciates a powerhouse lead performance.
Worth noting: The film was shot back-to-back with X in New Zealand, with the script co-written by Mia Goth during a mandatory two-week quarantine period.
Where to Watch: Amazon🛒
Rating: 4/5 Stars
(Career-best Mia Goth performance, stunning visual style, brutal and effective kills)
Welcome to Knockout Horror. Ti West’s MaXXXine recently released in cinemas so I figured this would be a good opportunity to catch up on the Maxine Minx series. I reviewed X yesterday and followed up, that night, by watching the movie we will be reviewing today, Pearl. If you want to read my thoughts on the latest entry, MaXXXine, click right here.
Table of Contents
This is the best entry into the series
Damn was I wrong to judge Pearl in a vacuum with the first movie. Pearl is a far superior movie to X in just about every way. I actually rate this as one of the better horror slashers in quite a long time. How much of that is West’s design versus Mia Goth’s increased involvement in the creation process is up for debate. But Pearl stands as a far stronger outing.
I should state, before we carry on: if you are a fan of X, Pearl is not a guaranteed must-watch. The two movies are so different from each other to the point that they share virtually nothing in common outside of the primary character. For those of you new to Ti West, this is what he does. Each of his movies tends to lampoon the style and presentation of a certain era in movie making. No two are ever very alike and none of his movies are distinctly his.
“Pearl is a far superior movie to X in just about every way. I actually rate this as one of the better horror slashers in quite a long time.”
He is a talented filmmaker but takes 90% of his cues from other movies. Pearl is slower, more story heavy, far more character-driven and far less like a traditional horror movie. Keep that in mind as you will experience no small amount of whiplash effect going into this movie. I expect the exact same thing from MaXXXine. The only question is which type of era and genre is he going to rip off next.
An interesting character study
The premise here is fairly simple. Pearl follows the origin story of X‘s ageing antagonist. We see Pearl as a young woman growing up on the first movie’s farm during wartime. Her strict mother places massive restrictions on her and demands compliance. Despite this, Pearl has dreams of making it to the big screen and she will do absolutely anything to achieve them.
The film plays out, mostly, from Pearl’s perspective and acts as a character study of someone with severe personality issues. Pearl’s murderous tendencies are on display early on but it isn’t until life attempts to get in the way of her aspirations that things really start to get crazy. The contrast between Pearl’s daydreaming and her mother’s stern discipline plays centre stage in the character’s development, as she finally begins to lose her will to leave her fantasy world and live in the real one.
Stylistically superior
Whereas X was set in the 70s and featured a Tobe Hooper inspired presentation and setup, Pearl leans far more into the Technicolor golden age of Hollywood in the 1930s. Everything is filmed with a bright, over-saturated colour palette, transitions are stripped right out of early talkies and there is a distinct Wizard of Oz vibe to everything.
“The style here doesn’t feel so obstructive. It never gets in the way of the story being told and it never feels as though the presentation is more important than the characters.”
As far as styles go, this is way more my cup of tea than X. The style here doesn’t feel so obstructive. It never gets in the way of the story being told and it never feels as though the presentation is more important than the characters or narrative. Sure, it won’t be for everyone and fans of X are sure to feel some sort of whiplash effect. But, for me, this is a much better-looking movie. West has captured a lot of what made movies from that era so charming and to do it against the backdrop of a horror movie is quite the achievement.
That doesn’t mean that the movie isn’t a visual treat, though. Certain scenes are brilliantly set up. Pearl’s audition for a dancing role is perfectly done and utterly hilarious. Her ending monologue is beautifully shot and features an inspired choice to use limited angles and long takes. And some of the kill scenes are excellent. One, in particular, later on in the movie is brilliant and one of my favourite slasher kills in quite a while. It’s rare that anything in horror makes us yell “RUN!!” at the screen while laughing wildly but Pearl achieved that with my fiancée and I. Pearl has a way of grabbing you and pulling you into what’s taking place. It’s thoroughly enjoyable stuff.
Less is more
I think a key factor in Pearl‘s improvement over X is that Ti West dials back the bullshit, a lot. This feels far less like Ti West trying too hard to appeal to the style-over-substance crowd and far more like a director trying to make a great horror with a well-developed story.
Gone are the overt references to other movies. Gone are the winks to the camera and gone are the poorly fleshed-out characters and pointless preamble. Everything here is deliberately designed to take us into the mind of Pearl. It feels as though everything has a point and a purpose. Something that X just didn’t share.
Whether any of this is deliberate, or not, is up for debate. Pearl was written in quick fashion during New Zealand’s two-week mandatory quarantine period before the production of X. The movie was greenlit before X even began filming and it would seem Mia Goth had a larger part in the creative process, sharing writing credits on the movie. Either way, Pearl benefits from the less is more approach in a huge way.
A fascinating character
I have to be honest, I wasn’t looking forward to this movie as I just didn’t think Pearl was an interesting character. X hinted at a dark past but I just didn’t see much reason to care. I was definitely mistaken on that point, though. Pearl is such a well-developed character and Goth is allowed to simply go wild with her. She leans heavily into traits commonly seen with personality disorders but turns it up to 11. Pearl’s need to be loved and appreciated results in murderous rage and it is so convincingly done.
“Legitimately great, beautifully shot, hilarious yet brutal and with one of the best horror performances in years from Goth.”
Goth switches from sweet as pie to insane lunatic in a heartbeat. The switch in her facial façade is actually quite shocking, making certain scenes an absolute riot for their spontaneity. You see it coming but you don’t see how it will happen. It’s great stuff. Goth is utterly fantastic.
This is one of the best performances in horror in a very long time. Her monologue later in the movie is one for the horror ages. The only criticism I could possibly aim at her is, like X, her accent slips every now and then and feels a bit pantomime at times. Everything else is perfect.
Special note has to go to New Zealand actor Tandi Wright who plays Pearl’s mother. Brought in at the last minute after a position as an intimacy coordinator on X, she is sensational. Learning the German lines in two weeks and absolutely nailing them is one thing. But to put on the convincing, and honestly quite touching, performance she does is incredible.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Mia Goth: A legendary performance that anchors the entire film; she makes the transition from dreamer to sociopath feel hauntingly inevitable.
- Visual Style: The over-saturated Technicolor palette is gorgeous and provides a jarring contrast to the grisly events of the plot.
- Pacing: By focusing on character development over cheap thrills, the eventual explosions of violence feel far more earned and impactful.
The Bad
- Whiplash: The drastic shift in tone from X might be disappointing for viewers who were expecting a more traditional, fast-paced slasher.
- Accent Slippage: Much like in the first film, Goth’s accent can occasionally feel a bit exaggerated or inconsistent in high-drama scenes.
The Ugly: The “Dinner Table” finale. A harrowing display of domestic rot and mental collapse that is as grotesque as any slasher kill, staying with you long after the credits roll.
Should You Watch Pearl?
Absolutely. Regardless of your feelings on X, Pearl is a superior piece of filmmaking that stands on its own as a brilliant horror drama. It is visually stunning, emotionally taxing, and features one of the most iconic horror villains of the modern era. It is essential viewing for anyone who values craft and performance in their horror.
You might also like:
- Host (2020) Review – The Ultimate Pandemic-Era Screenlife Horror
- Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter (1984) Review – The Best Of A Bad Bunch
- Diabolic (2025) Review – Don’t Believe the (Bot-Generated) Hype
- House on Eden (2025) review – Influencers take on found footage
- Pet Sematary (1989) Review – A Classic Melancholic Monkey’s Paw Tale
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.











