Stopmotion (2024) Review – Fantastic Animation Trapped In A Formulaic Horror Story
Stopmotion: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A visually arresting and technically impressive debut that unfortunately fails to match its creative peaks with a compelling narrative. Stopmotion succeeds as a showcase for Robert Morgan’s unsettling animation style, which provides some of the most genuinely creepy imagery of the year. However, when the film transitions to live-action, it falls into a predictable “descent into madness” blueprint that feels sluggish and overly familiar. Aisling Franciosi delivers a strong performance, but the script relies too heavily on well-worn horror tropes and repetitive editing techniques. It is a 3-star effort that is essential for animation fans but may leave seasoned horror viewers feeling slightly short-changed. A shiny coating of brilliance on an otherwise brown-bread horror story.
Details: Director: Robert Morgan | Cast: Aisling Franciosi, Stella Gonet, Tom York, Caoilinn Springall | Runtime: 1h 33m | Release Date: 23 February 2024
Best for: Fans of artisanal animation, lovers of practical creature effects, and viewers who appreciate a heavy, slow-burn psychological atmosphere.
Worth noting: Director Robert Morgan is a renowned stop-motion animator whose previous shorts, like Bobby Yeah, are cult classics in the genre.
Where to Watch: Amazon🛒, Shudder
Rating: 3/5 Stars
(Stunning puppet work, strong lead performance, incredibly formulaic plot)
Welcome to Knockout Horror. Today we are reviewing Robert Morgan’s feature-length horror debut Stopmotion from 2024 (well, 2023 but we don’t count the festival circuit). Debuting on horror streaming service Shudder just a little while ago, Stopmotion has been cited by many as an example of Shudder’s improved offerings in 2024.
Table of Contents
Is Shudder better in 2024?
Late Night With The Devil and In a Violent Nature are recent additions to the Shudder catalogue. While they are both fantastic, I am seeing little to justify handing over your hard-earned money to them. A few decent new movies a quarter is the very least you should expect. It is hardly enough to make up for the bulk of the catalogue which consists of movies you can find for free elsewhere and stuff so poor even YouTube channels like Terror Films have more to offer.
Stopmotion is one of Shudder’s most recent originals and people have been raving about it. Well, I say people. What I really mean is critics and small sections of the horror community. Needless to say, I went into the movie excited. I am a massive stop-motion fan and I couldn’t wait to see how it was implemented here.
The story follows stop-motion animator Ella Blake (Aisling Franciosi). Ella has been working for her overbearing, ailing, mother for some time, acting as her animator as she directs the shots. After her mother suffers a stroke, Ella sets out into the world and begins working on her own stop-motion film. A film that will consume her mind and become all too real.
The fantastic animation is a highlight
It is made very clear, almost immediately, that Stopmotion‘s primary gimmick is the animation contained within. Unfortunately, and it pains me to say this as I was hyped up and ready to love this movie; outside of that gimmick there is little else on offer. For the most part, this is a standard horror movie with segments of stop-motion animation spliced in here and there.
“Stop-motion looks kind of freaky, to put it bluntly. It has an almost inherent otherworldly quality about it and that is very much present here.”
Said animation deserves immense praise. It’s all pretty fantastic and acts as a shiny coating on an otherwise run-of-the-mill, bland as brown bread, horror movie. As mentioned earlier, I am a huge fan of stop-motion as an art form. Stop-motion holds a certain place in animation that I think few other mediums come close to. It’s fascinating and there is nothing else quite like it. Take the brilliant, visual feast, that is Coraline, for example.
It also works particularly well for horror. The janky, uncanny, movement style that comes from the manipulation of physical models lends itself well to the medium. Stop-motion looks kind of freaky, to put it bluntly. It has an almost inherent otherworldly quality about it and that is very much present here. The stop-motion animation segments are the highlight of the film and, indeed, a horror highlight of 2024.
Outside of the animation it is very bland
And while these animation segments deserve special praise, outside of them, this is a very bland and fairly dull horror movie that brings little else to the table. You could make the argument that the animation is enough to separate Stopmotion from its oh so familiar “descent into madness” horror movie compatriots. And, while I would be inclined to agree, it would be remiss of me to not point out the facts.
This is the very same horror movie you have seen a million times before. A person becomes obsessed with something. Said obsession takes over their life. They start losing their mind and bad stuff happens.
“This is the very same horror movie you have seen a million times before. A person becomes obsessed with something… and bad stuff happens.”
It is as vanilla as vanilla gets. Which is okay, some people like vanilla. But to lavish praise on a movie because of one specific factor is to offer potential viewers something that the movie can’t deliver on.
Meandering and extremely slow
This is a slow movie, much slower than the snappy 90-minute runtime would suggest. I found myself in a loop of mentally drifting off while waiting for the next stop-motion segment to start. Maybe I am not the best one to judge as my concentration levels are poor, but there was so little to cling onto outside of the movie’s titular gimmick. It is just bags and bags of dull, formulaic, personal drama.
Robert Morgan piles on the tropes throughout, as well, with the movie haphazardly skipping from one predictable moment to the next. We have everything here that you would expect in your average 2/5 rated horror movie. Jump scares, green and red-tinged hallucinogenic drug trips, muffled audio to indicate disconnection, bone-snapping visuals, an over-enthusiastic foley stage artist and fairly dull body horror complete with squelching noises and gore. It’s as if Morgan was given a horror trope checklist and made damn sure to check off every box.
On top of that, the editing is extremely poor at times. Snap scene switches, that I assume are to indicate the decline of Ella’s mental health, feel poorly placed and almost accidental. Shots will flip jarringly with no transition creating a bit of a whiplash effect. Combine that with some weird pacing issues and continuity that suggests that Ella is the fastest stop-motion animator of all time and it starts to feel a bit messy. There is a lot of overuse of certain techniques, as well. The muffled audio and blurred visuals are used so much that you may think you are going deaf-blind.
Plenty of positives
There are things to shout about, here, though. The stop-motion segments are, generally, fantastic. They remind me of segments from ABCs of Death for their presentation, length and animation style. Character design is fantastic and everyone looks suitably creepy. The animation is smooth and there are a decent number of these moments. My fiancée mentioned that the movie felt like an advertisement for a stop-motion director’s work and I think that is true. If Stopmotion does nothing else but encourages people to check out Robert Morgan’s many shorts, that is a good thing.
There are a few moments that are suitably creepy but horror vets will, potentially, find it all too familiar. There isn’t anything new outside of the stop-motion; this is milquetoast horror. But that will likely be plenty to keep most people entertained. Camera work is nice enough and Stopmotion feels pretty high budget.
“The animated segments are fantastic but the live-action segments are formulaic, predictable, and rather dull.”
There are some decent horror visuals that work fairly well, buried in here. Aisling Franciosi is fantastic, for the most part. I also really enjoyed Caoilinn Springall as the precocious “little girl”. There are some great child actors emerging in horror, as of late. Some of the scenes that combine stop-motion with live action are inventive and enjoyable, as well.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- The Animation: The physical puppet work is fantastic, eerie, and genuinely unique in the modern horror landscape.
- Lead Acting: Aisling Franciosi brings a real intensity to Ella, making her mental fracturing believable even when the script isn’t.
- Atmosphere: The film does an excellent job of capturing the isolating and claustrophobic nature of the animator’s craft.
The Bad
- Narrative Tropes: The “artist losing their mind” story is paper-thin and offers no new insights or surprises for genre fans.
- Pacing: Despite its short length, the film feels remarkably slow due to the repetitive nature of its live-action sequences.
- Editing: Some of the scene transitions are jarringly abrupt, making the film feel accidentally messy rather than intentionally chaotic.
The Ugly: The meat puppets. The film leans into some viscerally unpleasant “biological” stop-motion that is guaranteed to make you wince at the dinner table.
Should You Watch Stopmotion?
Yes, especially if you are a fan of the art form itself. The stop-motion segments are easily some of the coolest horror visuals of 2024. Just be prepared for a very standard, slow-burn psychological drama in between the animated brilliance. It’s worth a look for the gimmick alone, but it won’t change your life.
You might also like:
- Calibre (2018) Ending Explained – A Life for a Life
- The Frights Before Christmas: 25 Festive Horror Movies Ranked
- The Long Walk (2025) review – A Stephen King adaptation worth the wait
- Lowlifes (2024) Review – A Wickedly Fun and Bloody Surprise From Tubi
- Happy Death Day (2017) Review – A Fresh and Fun Slasher Time-Loop
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.











