Diabolic (2025) Review – Don’t Believe the (Bot-Generated) Hype
Diabolic (2025): Quick Verdict
The TL;DR: The cinematic definition of “meh”. Diabolic is a standard, trope-heavy possession flick that struggles to rise above mediocrity. While it boasts decent cinematography and a few atmospheric moments, it is ultimately weighed down by a woeful script, “beyond dull” non-linear padding, and a cult-focused backstory that drains the tension rather than building it. It’s serviceable enough for a rainy Tuesday if it ever makes its way to Tubi, but don’t pay for it, whatever you do. It’s far from the masterpiece its suspicious online reviews claim it to be.
Details: Director: Daniel J. Phillips | Cast: Elizabeth Cullen, John Kim | Runtime: 94 Min | Release Date: February 20th, 2026 | Where to Watch: Prime Rental / VOD
Best For: Completionists of Australian-made horror, viewers who enjoy FLDS cult themes, and anyone looking for a low-stakes “background” movie.
Worth Noting: Despite the American setting, keep an ear out for some “baffling” accent slipping from the Australian cast. The dialogue in the romantic subplots is also particularly rough, leading to moments of unintentional comedy that undercut the horror.
Did You Know: This film has become a textbook case of user score manipulation on IMDb. Despite a flood of suspicious 10/10 reviews hailing it as the “best horror movie of 2026”, the actual weighted user score tells a much more honest story of a movie that is aggressively average.
Rating: 2.5/5 Stars
(Decent visuals, atmospheric in parts, woeful dialogue, weighed down by dull padding)
Welcome to Knockout Horror. Today we are taking a look at Diabolic (2025).
Table of Contents
It’s Pretty standard Horror Fare, With a But…
Every now and then a movie comes along that leaves you with a prevailing sense of “meh”. It isn’t good, it isn’t particularly bad – it’s just “meh”. I know, my millennial is showing. Diabolic is one of those movies but there is an interesting caveat to my opinion on this film.
“At least 90% of the user reviews for this movie are fake and legitimate readers are pissed about it. The unweighted mean score is 7.5/10 while the actual user score is 5.6/10. That shows huge manipulation.”
The story follows Elise (Elizabeth Cullen), a young woman suffering from blackouts, occasionally odd behaviour, and a complete lack of desire to bump uglies with her knob of a boyfriend Adam (John Kim).

Determined to get to the bottom of it, she digs deep into her past to uncover a tangled web of supernatural folklore and religious indoctrination.
It’s standard stuff, right? It reads exactly like 10 different horror movies that will be released this year and another ten that you can find on Tubi right now.
As I said earlier, it’s extremely rote and unlikely to inspire much in the way of enthusiasm in any horror fan. Fine to fill in 90 minutes of your time but you probably won’t remember it a year down the line. That’s when that “but” comes in.
Don’t believe the hype
Now that statement isn’t just a song by classic rap group Public Enemy, it’s also a mantra that can be accurately applied to this movie. If you were to head on over to IMDb and take a look at the user reviews for Diabolic, you would be preparing yourself for a masterpiece of horror ingenuity.
I’ve never seen so many 10/10 scores. The phrase “best horror movie of 2026” is thrown around repeatedly (suspiciously by a couple of identical reviews left by people with different usernames). This is a textbook example of user score manipulation.
At least 90% of the user reviews for this movie are fake and legitimate readers are pissed about it. The unweighted mean score is 7.5/10 while the actual user score is 5.6/10. That shows huge manipulation and I expect that score to drop even further when IMDb realises the scale of the abuse.
So what’s the reality?
Strangely enough, the reality is that this movie didn’t really need to purchase reviews and ratings packages from black-hat sellers. It’s not a great film by any means but it’s certainly not terrible. It’s just extremely average.

The happy medium for relatively low budget horror is to bag a score in the 5.0-5.6/10 range and develop a niche audience that appreciates the potential. Real horror fans recognise that a lot of good titles exist in that range and they will temper their expectations.
Instead, Diabolic promises something it can never live up to and lots of people despise it for the lies. The truth of the matter is that this is a serviceable, yet very trope-heavy horror flick.
It’s rather mundane…
The story plays out in something of a non-linear fashion. We flit back and forth in time between the modern day and a time period that looks altogether more archaic.
“The slightly more compelling modern day investigation into Elise’s struggles are interrupted by meaningless lore dumping and trips to a past that would be best left where it is.”
This is where you might find yourself a little confused as it’s actually still the modern day, just as depicted through the eyes of someone living in a FLDS-based cult.
Elise’s attempts to confront a past she had buried and the insidious situation she grew up in sound pretty interesting. In reality, this is Diabolic’s biggest weak point. These sequences are beyond dull.

Nothing all that interesting happens and each minor plot development is padded with scenes that feel rather mundane and, ultimately, a bit pointless. Think The Village but without the more interesting monster aspect and you are half way there.
The slightly more compelling modern day investigation into Elise’s struggles are interrupted by meaningless lore dumping and trips to a past that would be best left where it is.
And extremely trope-heavy
The horror aspect only really comes on in the last 20 minutes, or so, and it’s pretty standard fare. This is a very trope-heavy movie that relies on characters making dumb decisions purely to further the story.
Naturally, this is going to disappoint a lot of viewers. It might just have you screaming at your screen a little, too. It’s a shame because when it works, it’s quite an atmospheric film with some actual promise.
So much time is spent decompressing the world’s lore, as well as our main character’s backstory, that it serves to actually sanitise some of the horror. When the possession stuff gets going, we know far too much for it to actually effectively feel scary.
There’s a few positives
On the plus side, some of the cinematography is quite nice and this is a decent looking film, for the most part. Naturally, it’s an Australian production about the FLDS so it had to be set in the USA. This leads to some baffling moments of accent slipping.

Acting, on the whole, is a bit mixed. Elizabeth Cullen is fine in the lead role, everyone else fades into the background somewhat. The script is abysmal, in parts, which really doesn’t help matters.
“So much time is spent decompressing the world’s lore, as well as our main character’s backstory, that it serves to actually sanitise some of the horror. “
Certain scenes between Elise and her boyfriend come across almost comically thanks to the terrible writing. One moment later on when Adam believes he has found the root cause of Elise’s lack of passion had me laughing my arse off for the terrible dialogue. It’s all pretty woeful.
The Good
- Cinematography: A decent-looking film with some genuinely nice visuals and atmospheric moments that show promise.
- Elizabeth Cullen: Provides a solid lead performance, managing to carry the film even when the supporting cast fades into the background.
- Atmospheric Tension: When the film finally commits to its horror elements in the final act, it manages to build a brief, effective sense of dread.
The Bad
- Mundane Padding: The non-linear “past” sequences are beyond dull, feeling like pointless lore-dumping that kills the momentum.
- Trope Overload: Relies heavily on characters making predictably dumb decisions just to force the plot forward.
- Accent Slipping: Some “baffling” moments of Australian accents breaking through the American setting that can be quite distracting.
- The Script: Laughable moments of poor dialogue serve to undermine many of the movie’s themes and tension.
The Ugly: The fake reviews. This movie features one of the most egregious examples of review botting I have seen in low-budget horror. Production companies and distributors should do better than this.
Should You Watch Diabolic?
Only if you have 90 minutes to kill and your expectations are firmly in the “average” range. Don’t let the manipulated IMDb scores fool you; this isn’t a masterpiece. It’s a standard, trope-heavy flick that is fine for a one-time watch but unlikely to stay with you once the credits roll.
You might also like:
- Ghost Webcam (2023) Review – A Low-Budget Screenlife Fumble
- 31 Best Funny Horror Movies to Stream Right Now – Gore and Gags
- A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) Review – The Slasher That Redefined Fear
- Opus (2025) review – A woefully disappointing psychological horror
- The Texas Witch (2025) review – Better than the IMDb score suggests?
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.






