Sting (2024) Review – A Highly Confused, occasionally enjoyable Creature Feature
Sting: Quick Verdict
The TL;DR: Sting is a seriously confused, whiplash-inducing monster movie that, honestly, suffers from a bit of an identity crisis. Trapped between a childhood whimsy creature feature and a legitimately brutal, adult body-horror thriller, the film doesn’t know what it wants to be or who it is actually made for. While the premise should be an easy win for arachnophobia-fueled scares, the script bogs itself down in dark family drama and awful, Police Academy-style comedy. On the positive side, creature design is fantastic and a highly confident lead performance from young actress Alyla Browne deserves mention. However, its tonal inconsistency makes it too violent for kids, too infantile for hardcore horror fans, and a bit of a mess overall.
Details: Director: Kiah Roache-Turner | Cast: Alyla Browne, Jermaine Fowler, Robyn Nevin | Runtime: 91 Minutes | Release Date: April 12th 2024 | Where to Watch: VOD / Streaming Platforms
Best For: Casual non-horror fans looking for basic jump scares, creature-feature completionists, and viewers who don’t mind a bizarre mashup of Eight Legged Freaks with graphic, R-rated gore.
Worth Noting: Despite its deeply muddled identity, the film boasts impressive production values. The CGI is mostly non-distracting, and the high-budget Hollywood sheen ensures that the creepy arachnid visuals are genuinely effective at making your skin crawl.
Did You Know: Young star Alyla Browne is a highly confident up-and-coming talent who delivers fantastic facial expressions, while horror veteran Robyn Nevin (Relic) clearly has an absolute blast chewing the scenery as Great Aunt Helga.
Is It Scary: The sheer concept of a giant jumping spider webbing up victims will easily freak out anyone with a mild case of arachnophobia. However, the genuine tension is constantly undercut by terrible comedy routines and mopey familial drama.
Rating: 2.5/5 Stars
(A frustratingly inconsistent monster movie that boasts great creature design and solid acting but completely drowns in its own tonal confusion.)
Welcome to Knockout Horror and to our review of Aussie creature feature Sting from 2024. This movie is all over streaming platforms and might be worth a watch but prepare yourself for some serious tonal confusion.
Table of Contents
It’s a big alien spider horror thing…
Sting follows the story of a young girl called Charlotte (Alyla Browne) who lives in a New York apartment with her mother, brother and step-father. While raiding her great aunt’s dollhouse, she finds a small spider that she decides to keep as a pet.
Naming the arachnid Sting, she discovers that the creature can replicate her calls and has a ravenous appetite.
Growing ever larger, it soon becomes clear that cockroaches are not going to be enough to satiate the enormous creature, leading Charlotte to wonder just what she has unleashed on her family.
Sting plays out as part creepy crawly horror, part familial drama movie, and part comedy. Let’s be perfectly honest for a second, these types of films write themselves.
How many people do you know who absolutely despise spiders? Arachnophobia is incredibly common. The formula couldn’t be more simple. Make the spider as creepy as possible, throw in some great scares, and keep the laughs coming to balance the fear factor.
It’s hard to fail if you get those elements right so why does it feel as though Sting misses the mark in such a big way?
A little context
Sitting down to watch a movie just before Christmas, my fiancée and I decided to throw on Violent Night. We assumed it was a horror but quickly realised that it was actually far more of an action movie Still, we found ourselves to be having a pretty good time.
There was one problem, though… I just couldn’t shake the feeling that it didn’t know what the hell it wanted to be. It is trapped somewhere between a Gremlins like, family-friendly Christmas romp and a bloody, ultra-violent action movie.
Sting is an even more egregious example of this very phenomena. For a start, our protagonist here is a 12-year-old girl. She’s a little rebellious but all she wants from life is to be noticed by her step-dad.
She travels through the apartment block’s air ducts and uses gadgets like a modern-day Kevin McCallister. She cries when her parents don’t understand her and she misses her real dad.
We are going to spend the majority of the film flitting between familial drama and kid’s adventure movie before Sting finally grows some balls and becomes a proper creature-feature. It’s tonally confused.
“Sting is an even more egregious example of a horror movie not knowing what it wants to be.”
It’s actually tough to overemphasize how much tonal whiplash this movie will give you. One minute it is whimsical trips through the apartment’s ventilation system before it suddenly switches to the kid’s lousy step-dad flipping his lid over some minor shit.
The whole thing wraps up with some absolute mega violence featuring skinned animals, horrible killings, tons of swearing, and a lot of terribly executed comedy. I have no idea who the hell this movie is made for.
Who is this made for?
In fact, I would go as far as to say that this is one of the most confused horror movies I have ever watched.
On one hand it is a mild kid’s horror movie like Small Soldiers or Eight Legged Freaks, with a heroic kid donning a water pistol to fight back against the baddies. On the other hand it is a violent horror featuring barbaric acts of brutality that no kid should ever really be sitting down to enjoy.
It gets even more confusing when you throw in some Police Academy-style comedy. It is a mess and the movie suffers massively for it. It’s like Guillermo del Toro does Batteries Not Included with Damien Leone advising on gore-quota.
Very few adults are going to relate to, or enjoy, the character of Charlotte. Most are going to find her bratty, needy, and a bit obnoxious. Step-dad Ethan is a horrible cunt, and everyone else in the film is a basic horror caricature or, worse still, an offensive stereotype.
“It is a mess and the movie suffers massively for it. It’s like Guillermo del Toro does Batteries Not Included.”
Barely any of the characters are likeable and the plot is legitimately infantile. I’d say it might be for mid-teen kids but even they will probably find a lot of the drama elements cringe. Don’t even get me started on the movie’s bile inducing ending. Simply put, nothing here lands and there is no intended audience.
The violence is not gory enough for proper horror fans but it is far too gory for the kids who might enjoy the childhood whimsy of Charlotte’s adventures. The comedy will likely appeal to nobody because it is just so awful and the “cancer diagnosis levels of serious” family drama couldn’t feel more out of place.
It is impossible not to come out of this movie feeling a little dazed and confused. It is consistently inconsistent and has no clue what it wants to be or who it wants to appeal to which seriously undermines enjoyment of the entire thing.
On the plus side
There are a few positives, however. The movie is just so simple that it is likely to appeal to non-horror fans who just want some basic scares. You can’t go too far wrong with a creepy spider jumping out from nowhere and webbing up unsuspecting victims. The Hollywood-style high production values help with that, too.
Some absolute sadists may enjoy the comedy, so I suppose that deserves a mention. Hell, there may even be a few adults out there who never got over their own daddy issues that may enjoy Charlotte’s specific family-life struggles.
“The makers of Sting threw every piece of shit at the wall hoping the sticky mess would create a cohesive horror.”
Some of the creature design is pretty decent. Sting is clearly based on a black widow spider and looks fantastic. Scenes focusing on the creepy design are sure to send shivers up the spines of people who hate arachnids. They’ll be freaking out at every little tickle on their arms for the next week or two.
As mentioned earlier, the movie feels very high budget and there is that distinctive Hollywood sheen coating every surface. Some of the shots were quite creative, here and there, as well and the CGI used isn’t too distracting.
Alyla Browne has a promising career ahead of her, too. She is a very confident young actor and works with facial expressions a lot better than most actors her age. I also really enjoyed Jermaine Fowler as exterminator Frank. Relic‘s Robyn Nevin is clearly having a great time chewing the scenery as Helga which I liked and most of the cast does just fine.
The problem with Sting is simply one of a confused identity. It doesn’t know what it wants to be and it never feels comfortable in its skin. Nothing gels because it just doesn’t fit together smoothly and a consequence of that is a constant feeling of stopping and starting that prevents it from really getting going. I’d suggest the movie Cold Storage as a much more fun and tonally consistent alternative.
The Good
- Great Creature Design: The spider design, closely modeled on a black widow, looks fantastic and is guaranteed to trigger genuine spine-chilling creeps.
- Strong Lead Performance: Alyla Browne proves she has a highly promising career ahead of her, acting with confidence and expressive depth far beyond her age.
- Sleek Production Values: Features a high-end Hollywood sheen with creative cinematography and clean, non-distracting special effects.
- Entertaining Supporting Cast: Jermaine Fowler is a fun addition as the exterminator Frank, and Robyn Nevin does a brilliant job chewing the scenery.
The Bad
- Severe Tonal Confusion: Erratically bounces between a kid-friendly Home Alone air-duct adventure, deep domestic drama, and brutal adult body horror.
- Unlikable Character Writing: The protagonist often comes across as a bratty, obnoxious caricature, while the step-father is a mopey, useless cliché.
- Terrible Comedy: The humor is poorly executed, cringe-inducing, and actively kills any creeping atmosphere the movie tries to establish.
- Infantile Plotting: Drowns a fun creature-feature premise in an underdeveloped, basic script, rounded out by a hugely unsatisfying ending.
The Ugly: The “throw everything at the wall” execution. By mixing ultra-violent skinned animals and swearing adults with toddler-level whimsy and heavy drama, the film leaves viewers entirely dazed, confused, and visually whiplashed.
Should You Watch Sting?
If you are desperate for a basic creature feature and can completely switch your brain off, you might enjoy it. Sting has all the raw ingredients for a great spider horror, including excellent effects, strong acting, and a high budget, but the filmmakers completely ruin the recipe by refusing to pick a lane. It is too gory for younger audiences who would enjoy the childhood adventure aspect, yet far too childish and joke-heavy for seasoned horror fans. It is a consistently inconsistent mess that leaves you completely dazed by its conflicting identities.
You might also like:
- Birth/Rebirth (2023) Review – A Chillingly Clinical Reimagining Of The Frankenstein Myth
- 825 Forest Road (2025) review – A generic trudge through haunted house tropes
- The Innocents (2021) Review – A Brutal and Bleak Study of Childhood Power
- Speak No Evil (2024) Review – A Rare Remake That Actually Improves Upon The Original
- Christmas Bloody Christmas (2022) review – A loud and obnoxious festive fail
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.









