Sting (2024) Review – A Highly Confused And Tonal Mess Of A Creature Feature
Sting: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A bizarrely tonally inconsistent creature feature that fails to find its target audience. Sting attempts to blend the childhood whimsy of a “boy and his dog” adventure with the brutal violence of a modern slasher, resulting in a film that is too juvenile for adults and too graphic for children. While the spider design is impressive and Alyla Browne delivers a strong lead performance, the script is weighed down by cringey drama and poorly executed comedy. It is a predictable and often frustrating experience that feels like several different movies fighting for screen time. A 2.5-star effort that is fine for a mindless watch but ultimately fails to weave a cohesive web.
Details: Director: Kiah Roache-Turner | Cast: Alyla Browne, Ryan Corr, Jermaine Fowler, Robyn Nevin | Runtime: 1h 31m | Release Date: 12 April 2024
Best for: Non-horror fans looking for simple scares and viewers who appreciate high-quality practical creature effects over narrative depth.
Worth noting: The spider effects were handled by the legendary Weta Workshop, known for their work on The Lord of the Rings and King Kong.
Where to Watch: Amazon🛒
Rating: 2.5/5 Stars
(Fantastic creature design, strong lead acting, complete tonal disaster)
Welcome to Knockout Horror and to our review of Aussie horror movie Sting from 2024.
Table of Contents
It’s a big alien spider horror thing…
Sting follows the story of a young girl called Charlotte (Alyla Browne) who lives in a New York apartment with her mother, brother and step-father. While raiding her great aunt’s dollhouse, she finds a small spider that she decides to keep as a pet. Naming the arachnid Sting, she discovers that the creature can replicate her calls and has a ravenous appetite.
Growing ever larger, it soon becomes clear that cockroaches are not going to be enough to satiate the enormous creature, leading Charlotte to wonder just what she has unleashed on her family.
Sting plays out as part creepy crawly horror, part familial drama movie and part comedy. Tons of people hate spiders, right? Arachnophobia is super common. How could this movie fail? Well, let’s take a look.
A little context
Sitting down to watch a movie just before Christmas, my fiancée and I decided to throw on Violent Night. Assuming it was a horror but quickly realising it was far more of an action movie, we found ourselves to be having a pretty good time but I just couldn’t shake one annoying feeling: “This movie doesn’t know what the hell it wants to be”. It is trapped somewhere between a Gremlins like, family-friendly, Christmas romp and a bloody, ultra-violent, action movie.
Sting is an even more egregious example of a horror movie not knowing what it wants to be. For a start, our protagonist here is a 12-year-old girl. She’s a little rebellious but all she wants from life is to be noticed by her step-dad. She travels through the apartment block’s air ducts and uses gadgets like a modern-day Kevin McCallister. She cries when her parents don’t understand her and she misses her real dad.
“Sting is an even more egregious example of a horror movie not knowing what it wants to be.”
The movie kicks off with recaps of Charlotte’s adventures through the home’s cooling system and her feeding of her new pet “spider from space” Sting. Before switching to some fairly deep familial drama as perennial loser step-dad Ethan fails at everything he tries and makes life awkward for those around him. The whole thing wraps up with some absolute mega violence featuring skinned animals, horrible killings, tons of swearing and a lot of terribly executed comedy. It’s a bit whiplash inducing to say the least.
Who is this made for?
This is one of the most confused horror movies I have ever seen. On one hand it is a mild kid’s horror movie like Small Soldiers or Eight Legged Freaks, with a heroic kid donning a water pistol to fight back against the baddies. On the other hand it is a violent and adult horror featuring barbaric acts of brutality and body horror that no kid should ever really watch. Throw in some Police Academy style comedy and you are somewhere close to what Sting is all about. It is a mess and the movie suffers massively for it. It’s like Guillermo del Toro does Batteries Not Included.
Very few adults are going to relate to, or enjoy, the character of Charlotte. Most are going to find her bratty, needy and a bit obnoxious. Step-dad Ethan is useless and mopey and everyone else in the film is a basic horror caricature or, worse still, an offensive stereotype.
“It is a mess and the movie suffers massively for it. It’s like Guillermo del Toro does Batteries Not Included.”
Barely any of the characters are likeable and the plot is legitimately infantile. I’d say it might be for mid-teen kids but even they will probably find a lot of the drama elements cringe. Don’t even get me started on the movie’s bile inducing ending.
The violence is not gory enough for proper horror fans but far too gory for kids who may enjoy the childhood whimsy of Charlotte’s adventures. And the comedy will likely appeal to nobody because it is just so awful. When you throw in the cancer diagnosis levels of serious family drama that goes to some pretty dark places, it is hard not to come out of this movie feeling a little dazed and confused. It is consistently inconsistent and has no clue what it wants to be or who it wants to appeal to.
On the plus side
There are a few positives, however. The movie is just so simple that it is likely to appeal to non-horror fans who just want some basic scares. You can’t go too far wrong with a creepy spider jumping out from nowhere and webbing up unsuspecting victims. Some absolute sadists may enjoy the comedy and there may be a few adults out there who never got over their own daddy issues that may enjoy Charlotte’s specific complexities.
“The makers of Sting threw every piece of shit at the wall hoping the sticky mess would create a cohesive horror.”
Some of the creature design is pretty decent. Sting is, clearly, based on a black widow spider and looks fantastic. Some of the scenes focusing on the creepy design are sure to send shivers up the spines of people who hate spiders, guaranteeing that they are freaking out at every little tickle on their arms for the next week or two. The movie feels very high budget and there is that distinctive Hollywood sheen coating every surface. Some of the shots were quite creative, here and there, as well and the CGI used isn’t too distracting.
Alyla Browne has a promising career ahead of her. She is a very confident young actor and works with facial expressions a lot better than most actors her age. I also really enjoyed Jermaine Fowler as exterminator Frank. Relic‘s Robyn Nevin is clearly having a great time chewing the scenery as Helga which I liked and most of the cast does just fine.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Creature Design: Sting looks menacing and realistic, providing some genuine skin-crawling moments for arachnophobes.
- Alyla Browne: A standout performance from a young actor who manages to be convincing even when the script is not.
- Production Values: The film looks great, with creative cinematography and polished visual effects that hide its smaller budget.
The Bad
- Tonal Whiplash: The jump between “Disney Channel” family drama and “R-rated” gore is jarring and poorly handled.
- Unlikable Characters: Outside of the lead, the characters are largely annoying caricatures that are difficult to root for.
- Predictability: The plot follows an incredibly safe and infantile blueprint that removes any real sense of tension.
The Ugly: The Comedy. The attempts at humour are so dated and unfunny that they frequently kill any lingering atmosphere the film managed to build.
Should You Watch Sting?
If you just want a simple “monster in the house” movie with some cool spider effects, it is a decent enough way to kill 90 minutes. However, if you value a consistent tone and a story that treats its audience like adults, you will likely find Sting more irritating than entertaining. It’s a mess, but a well-designed one.
You might also like:
- Scream 7 Ending Explained: The New Ghostface Revealed
- Red Snow (2021) Review – A Light and Festive Vampire Rom-Com
- Ready or Not 2: Here I Come Review: A Gory Rehash? (Quick Verdict + Analysis)
- F*** Marry Kill (2024) review – An outdated and uninspiring date-night thriller
- Ick (2024) review – A cringe-inducing trip to the 2000s
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.









