Starve Acre (2024) Review – A Glacially Paced But Atmospheric Tribute To 70s Folk Horror
Starve Acre: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A meticulously crafted and grime-soaked homage to the golden era of British folk horror. Starve Acre succeeds brilliantly as a period piece, utilizing vintage aesthetics and understated performances from Matt Smith and Morfydd Clark to build a thick, unsettling atmosphere. However, its glacial pacing and refusal to cater to modern sensibilities may leave many viewers behind. It is a film that demands absolute patience, rewarding those who stick with it with a haunting, if somewhat cryptic, finale. A solid 3-star entry into the sub-genre that prioritizes tone and dread over traditional scares. It is folk horror in its rawest, most traditional form.
Details: Director: Daniel Kokotajlo | Cast: Matt Smith, Morfydd Clark, Arthur Shaw, Erin Richards | Runtime: 1h 38m | Release Date: 6 September 2024 (UK)
Best for: Fans of classic 70s British horror, lovers of slow-burn psychological dramas, and those who appreciate atmospheric “daylight horror.”
Worth noting: The film is an adaptation of the award-winning 2019 novel by Andrew Michael Hurley, known for his work in modern gothic and folk fiction.
Where to Watch: Amazon🛒
Rating: 3/5 Stars
(Superb 70s aesthetic, strong lead performances, glacially slow pace)
Welcome to Knockout Horror. Folk horror is weird, right? We all know that, trippy visuals, uncomfortably odd characters, and bizarre plots are, typically, the order of the day when it comes to this sub-genre. Today’s movie, Starve Acre, might be one of the strangest.
Table of Contents
A throwback to another era
Starve Acre follows the story of a young family who are living on the childhood farm of the family’s patriarch, Richard (Matt Smith). The couple’s son, Owen (Arthur Shaw), claims to have heard whistling at night and has begun acting strangely.
“Starve Acre is a real throwback to a certain time in British horror where folk tales, strangeness, and a foreboding sense of unease ruled.”
Having heard legends of a mystical tree located somewhere on the property. They wonder if there is some connection between it and their son’s out of character behaviour. Richard begins searching for the tree’s roots but finds much more than he could have imagined.
Starve Acre is a real throwback to a certain time in British horror where folk tales, strangeness, and a foreboding sense of unease ruled. Going into this film, it is immediately clear where its inspirations lie.
A real ode to 70s horror
Starve Acre wears its Wicker Man and Omen style clothing like a badge of honour. Rarely has a modern horror felt so fitting of the BFI Films label. This movie feels like it could have come straight out of the 70s and that is, obviously, exactly what director Daniel Kokotajlo is going for.
Filmed on, what appears to be, actual movie-making equipment of the era. A heavy grain coats every scene of period accurate nostalgia. You can almost feel the imposing presence of bell-bottom jeans, vinyl record players, oversized headphones and an abundance of beige furniture. This is every bit the loving tribute to 60s and 70s British horror.
It is, also, a fairly interesting take on an increasingly popular type of genre theme. Folk horror has undergone a bit of a resurgence as of late, predominantly due to Midsommar and the uber-popular The Witch. But Kokotajlo wants to eschew that cleanness and sanitisation for a more dirty, rough, and accurate nod to the decades that popularised it. This is folk horror how your grandparents remember it.
And herein lies the problem
This is exactly what will divide viewers of Starve Acre. It looks old and it feels old. This is the type of movie that wants you to watch a few times to really “get it”. It wants you to keep an eye on the minor details so that you understand the bigger ones. And it wants you to do all of that while sitting through something that can only be described as being fairly glacial. This is an incredibly slow-moving movie. Sure, in the 60s and 70s, this was commonplace. But we live in the age of the internet, TikTok, fast food and instant access gratification.
For a generation that was fairly used to having to sit through protracted, and pointlessly long, adult movies just to get their rocks off. Or, even worse, having to whip out the Mills and Boon novels. Paying attention to a slow-paced horror movie with minimal story progression and limited character development. Just to get to one scene that could best be described as “strange” really wasn’t that big of a deal.
“This is violently slow-paced. There is little in the way of story and nothing in the way of action.”
Today’s generation ain’t all about that. Midsommar was long and “weird”. But Ari Aster had the sense to keep feeding the Gen Z members of the audience with violent kills and the occasional shocking bit of nudity to keep them invested. Starve Acre does none of that and it will suffer for it. This is violently slow-paced. There is little in the way of story and nothing in the way of action. Stuff happens and that is about it. You are expected to sit, watch, and wait.
Still a decent movie
If you go in with your expectations set, then this is still a very good movie. Especially by folk horror standards. As mentioned, earlier, this feels like a flick pulled right out of the 70s and if that is your jam then you will love it. Kokotajlo has tapped into elements from many horror movies of the era. Meaning you will see things in here that remind you of films like Rosemary’s Baby and the like but it all works pretty well and feels quite welcome. Time has done a nice job of erasing the sense of overfamiliarity that this style can invoke.
The story is slow-burning but fairly compelling and the general sense of unease is consistent, throughout. Folk horror always expects you to work for your enjoyment and Starve Acre is no different. You are never quite sure which direction the story will go in and the direction it does is quite refreshing. Even if, at times, it feels a little lacking in flesh, as the case may be.
The story bounces between examining Richard’s exploration into the grounds of the property and the interpersonal issues between him and Juliette after a recent tragedy. Much of the time we are watching him digging up the ground and witnessing strange happenings that are, frankly, inexplicable. While the rest of the time we observe the difficulties of grief and the different ways people cope with loss. It’s interesting stuff but the horror is restrained and, very much, takes a back seat to the drama element.
Starve Acre shows some admirable restraint in keeping its major horror scenes until the final act. But that will probably leave some people wanting. The rather rough narrative can make the journey there a chore, in parts, as well. But the consistently atmospheric mood may just keep you coming back for more. The ending is one that might leave you wondering what the hell you just watched. But isn’t that what makes folk horror so appealing?
Gorgeous cinematography and great acting
Starve Acre is gorgeous in its artsyness. Shots are beautifully set up and most of the movie takes place in the daytime allowing for some of that brilliant daylight horror that is becoming so popular lately.
“Morfydd Clark is brilliant, as always. She does the little things so well that her performances are almost always entirely believable.”
The scenery is beautiful and the contrast between the wide outdoors and the claustrophobic interior of the farm makes for a stark illustration of the different character’s inner struggles and conflict.
Acting is strong throughout. Matt Smith is excellent but does seem to over egg the ol’ Yorkshire accent at times. Saint Maud‘s Morfydd Clark is brilliant, as always. She does the little things so well that her performances are almost always entirely believable. I feel like she should be a much bigger star than she is. Plus she is Welsh so she gets bonus points for that.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- The Aesthetic: The recreation of 70s British film stock is flawless, providing an immediate sense of nostalgia and unease.
- Acting: Morfydd Clark and Matt Smith deliver nuanced performances that elevate the film’s heavy themes of grief.
- Atmosphere: The film maintains a consistent and heavy sense of dread from start to finish.
The Bad
- Pacing: It is exceptionally slow-moving, with very little actual plot progression for large stretches of time.
- Restraint: The choice to hold back most of the horror elements until the final act may leave many genre fans feeling underwhelmed.
The Ugly: The Hare. Without spoiling it, the practical effects used in the film’s strangest sequences are guaranteed to leave a lingering, uncomfortable image in your mind.
Should You Watch Starve Acre?
If you have a high tolerance for slow stories and love the specific vibe of 70s British horror, then yes, you should watch it. However, if you prefer your horror with more action and a faster narrative pace, you are likely to find Starve Acre more frustrating than frightening.
You might also like:
- Ho-Ho-Homicide: 20 Christmas Slasher Movies Ranked From Naughty to Nice (Updated 2025)
- Lovely, Dark and Deep (2023) Review – A Tense Missing 411 Inspired Wilderness Horror
- Strange Harvest (2025) review – Stuart Ortiz delivers a gruesome mockumentary
- House on Eden (2025) review – Influencers take on found footage
- The Bayou (2025) review – Methed-up gators and messed-up accents
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.










