New Folder (2024) Review – An Ultra Low Budget Study In Voyeuristic Boredom
New Folder: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A raw and unapologetically bare-bones entry into the found footage genre that succeeds in its realism but fails in its pacing. New Folder is a hobbyist production that manages to capture an unsettling, voyeuristic atmosphere reminiscent of real-life stalking cases. While director L.R. Smith deserves credit for the gritty authenticity he achieves with minimal equipment, the film is hampered by a tedious opening and a narrative that feels stretched thin at feature length. It is a 2 star effort that would have been far more effective as a tight 15-minute short. Recommended only for die-hard found footage completionists who have a high tolerance for slow, DIY storytelling.
Details: Director: L.R. Smith | Cast: L.R. Smith, Breezy Smith | Runtime: 1h 22m | Release Date: 1 May 2024
Best for: Fans of ultra-low budget “guerrilla” filmmaking and those who enjoy the specific, uncomfortable dread of voyeuristic horror.
Worth noting: The film was produced with a Samsung HMX-F80, an entry-level camcorder that contributes significantly to its “authentic” found footage look.
Where to Watch: YouTube (Free)
Rating: 2/5 Stars
(Gritty realism, unsettling voyeurism, painfully slow pacing)
Welcome to Knockout Horror. We have covered some ultra low budget horror movies on this site. Some of them, like Something Walks in the Woods for example, are pretty damn awful. Others, e.g. Life of Belle, are actually quite good but I don’t know if any of them are quite as low budget and quite as DIY as the movie we are reviewing today – New Folder from 2024. You can check this movie out for free on L.R. Smith’s YouTube Channel.
Table of Contents
As bare bones as they come
This is, perhaps, the most fitting example of “have a go” directing that you will see all year. This is one dude, L.R. Smith, grabbing a camera (apparently a Samsung HMX-F80 which you can currently purchase on eBay for about £50) and making a movie about a stalker harassing an unsuspecting woman and streaming the events to, what I can only imagine, are an audience of snuff film fans.
“This is, perhaps, the most fitting example of ‘have a go’ directing that you will see all year.”
It’s as simple of an idea as they come. Thoroughly unoriginal and thoroughly lacking in innovation. Still, I find a strange type of enjoyment in these movies. There is a certain kind of charm to them. I mean, where else can you find ideas like this other than in found footage horror?
Someone literally saying to their wife “Hey, I am going to make a movie. I’m not going to write a script, I am not going to purchase decent equipment, I am not even going to hire any actors…. By the way, I am going to brutally murder you at the end of the film.. K thanks!”. And actually doing it, slapping it up on YouTube and asking for people’s opinions. You would only find this thing in horror and only via the medium of found footage.
People… were less than impressed
As you can probably imagine, the YouTube comments were less than complimentary. Mr Smith kept his chin held high, however, and liked every comment. Clearly grateful for people taking the time to actually check the movie out. Being perfectly honest, there are a few things that New Folder gets right and a few things that deserve some praise.
Keeping in mind that this is more of a hobby film than anything, L.R. Smith has done a pretty good job of nailing that unsettling style of voyeurism that actually took place in real-life crime cases such as that of the Lauren Giddings murder. You don’t need fancy equipment for this type of thing. You just need someone with a desire to spy on people and a 50x optical zoom on their camera.
People complained about the cameraman’s heavy breathing but we are supposed to think he is a weirdo. What better way than to have him sucking air every half second of the movie. Well, maybe that is a bit of a reach but it works given the context. The bigger problem is that it is all just rather boring.
Just quite dull
The majority of the movie is presented as a series of clips played by the perpetrator to a livestream audience. Things don’t start off positively. For some reason, Mr Smith deemed it necessary to make the viewer sit through the process of copying the videos to the aforementioned New Folder.
“If your opening shot of files being copied into a folder is long enough for someone to pick up a new hobby… You might want to rethink it.”
This was legitimately painful to watch. It went on long enough for my fiancée to decide that she wanted to start a baking day each week where she makes cakes and biscuits, as well as hedgehog friendly snacks for the local spiky denizens of our back garden. If your opening shot of files being copied into a folder is long enough for someone to pick up a new hobby.. You might want to rethink it.
The rest of the movie simply features a bunch of clips of not much happening. The perpetrator finds his victim, films her through the window, stalks the house etc etc. It’s entirely what you would expect and probably would have worked far better as a short film. It’s hard not to think of some of the V/H/S anthology movie segments when watching. The format would have been far more suited to something much shorter and straight to the point. Still, with that being said, I didn’t hate it. It is gritty and realistic enough to work. It will creep a few people out, I am sure, and that’s an achievement in itself.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Voyeuristic Authenticity: The film nails the creepy, handheld style of real-life stalker footage, making it genuinely uncomfortable at times.
- DIY Spirit: There is a commendable “have a go” energy here that serves as an inspiration for aspiring low-budget filmmakers.
- Gritty Tone: The lack of polish actually helps the movie feel more like a real digital artifact found on a hard drive.
The Bad
- Opening Sequence: Making the audience watch files being copied into a folder is a bold, but ultimately tedious, directorial choice.
- Lack of Innovation: The plot follows the most basic stalker blueprint without offering any new twists or surprises.
- Feature Length: The story simply doesn’t have enough substance to justify an 82-minute runtime, leading to significant stretches of boredom.
The Ugly: The “File Transfer” wait. An opening that is so long it physically encourages the viewer to find something else to do before the horror even starts.
Should You Watch New Folder?
Only if you are a fan of “bare-bones” horror or are looking for something free to watch on a quiet evening. It is a gritty and occasionally creepy film, but the slow pace and repetitive nature make it a difficult recommendation for casual horror fans. It is a 2 star film that functions best as a curiosity of modern DIY production.
You might also like:
- Unseen (2023) Review – A Stylish and Spirited Cat-and-Mouse Thriller
- Starve Acre (2024) Review – A Glacially Paced But Atmospheric Tribute To 70s Folk Horror
- The Fly (1986) Review – A Masterclass In Body Horror And Tragedy
- Brightburn (2019) Review – A Visceral and Mean-Spirited Superhero Slasher
- Loop Track (2023) Ending Explained – What Was Chasing Ian
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.









