Push (2024) review – A pregnant pause in entertainment
Push: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A home invasion thriller that forgets the thrills. Push takes a high-stakes premise, a heavily pregnant woman fighting for survival, and reduces it to a repetitive cycle of walking slowly and closing doors. While Alicia Sanz gives a committed performance and the cinematography has its moments, the film is lethargic, oppressively dark, and devoid of tension. It is a “cat and mouse” game where both parties seem to be moving in slow motion.
Details: Directors: David Charbonier, Justin Douglas Powell | Cast: Alicia Sanz | Runtime: 1h 35m | Release Date: 2025
Best for: People who really enjoy looking at opulent real estate, or those looking for a background movie while they do something else.
Worth noting: The movie is incredibly dark. You will likely need to turn your lights off and your TV brightness up to see what is happening.
Where to Watch: Streaming on Shudder.
Rating: 2.5/5 Stars
(Boring, dark, repetitive)
Welcome to Knockout Horror. Today we are going to be taking a look at the horror, thriller, movie Push (2024). This is a Shudder original so you know where you can find it.
Table of Contents
A hilarious and rather stupid premise
The premise to this movie is absolutely hilarious. Basically, a real estate agent wants to close a deal on a supposedly cursed house to prove she is capable and self sufficient. The only problem is that a potential client decides to not purchase the house and, instead, pursue the woman around the grounds in a life or death game of cat and mouse.
Oh, and she is, like, 8 months pregnant. That’s where the title comes from; it’s sort of a play on words regarding the process of giving birth.
Before we start with the review I should do a little shameless self promotion. We have already explained the ending to this movie. So, if you have arrived here having watched Push and left feeling a bit confused, check out our Push Ending Explained article.
It’s not as interesting as it sounds
A heavily pregnant woman trying to escape a marauding killer. Sounds, at least, a little interesting, right? You can probably already picture the various nail biting scenarios our protagonist is going to find herself in. The problem is, Push is nowhere near as interesting as it sounds.
“To be perfectly honest, the fact that it took two directors… to decide that the action here should mostly consist of a woman slowly ambling around shutting doors is kind of remarkable.”
To be perfectly honest, the fact that it took two directors, David Charbonier and Justin Douglas Powell, to decide that the action here should mostly consist of a woman slowly ambling around shutting doors is kind of remarkable.

I’m really not exaggerating for the sake of writing something ridiculous, either. This is what the majority of the runtime consists of and this is what makes up the bulk of the action. When I saw the title Push I thought it related to the act of labour, not the act of pushing doors closed.
Nathalie (Alicia Sanz) spends the majority of her time walking from room to room, very slowly, and closing doors and windows. She even remarks on it at one point, exclaiming “How many doors does this place have?“. I am not sure you should be drawing attention to that. Push is, quite frankly, a very boring movie.
Sooo slow and very boring
The premise, itself, hamstrings the action rather spectacularly. Nathalie is, understandably, very slow and often prioritises stopping to groan in agony over actually engaging in exciting chase sequences. The crazy thing is, these moments actually end up providing some welcome relief from the plodding nature of the action.
The movie does try to warn you, to be honest, and I should have seen it coming. The first shot of the house itself is a long trailing sequence of Nathalie walking through the home opening blinds and windows. It truly starts as it means to go on. The chase scenes just repeat this formula but in the dark.
“Push might, actually, be one of the few thriller movies that is completely devoid of any thrilling sequences.”
What’s sort of crazy is that when we aren’t following Nathalie as she ambles around we are following the antagonist who does the exact same thing. I understand why she doesn’t go anywhere in a hurry but I don’t know what his excuse is?

Push might, actually, be one of the few thriller movies that is completely devoid of any thrilling sequences. Moments designed to feel tense really don’t amount to much. There’s only so many times you can wonder whether a person’s baby bump will fit through a tight space before it becomes repetitive.
The movie drags, and drags, and just when you think it is done it changes the location and drags some more. There’s a few big revelations here and there (that we go over in our ending explained article) but they feel inconsequential. This film is so slow paced and middling that it is very difficult to care.
The cinematography can be pretty great
On the plus side, I thought the cinematography had some high points. Some of the long trailing shots are actually pretty impressive. Push can be weirdly reminiscent of 60s and 70s horror, at times. That all evaporates during night time scenes, though. Check out the screenshots in this review. This movie is oppressively dark for the majority of its runtime. Like.. Squint at the screen, dark.
“This movie is oppressively dark for the majority of its runtime. Like.. Squint at the screen, dark.”
Alicia Sanz does a nice job; you really can’t argue with her commitment to the role. It can’t be much fun having to wear a prosthetic bump and crawl around on your hands and knees for an entire shoot. I wonder if she negotiated a “closed door” bonus like Tony Todd did with bee stings in Candyman? An extra grand for every door closed.

The location is pretty great. This is a very opulent and, frankly, very cool house. Too many doors, though! I didn’t feel as though the location was really used to its potential. For such a big estate, far too much time was spent in non-descript parts of the house and in exterior locations.
There is a little twist right at the end that opens the story up a little and takes it into horror, slasher, territory. It’s a bit too little, too late, though. The character decisions are, frankly, absolutely ridiculous. I know, it’s a thriller, what am I expecting? It feels beyond silly, at times, though.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Alicia Sanz: She is committed to the physical demands of the role, crawling around and emoting well despite the limited script.
- The Cinematography: There are some impressive long takes and trailing shots that give the film a vintage 70s horror vibe in places.
- The House: It is a great location for a horror movie, even if it is mostly used for door-closing practice.
The Bad
- The Pacing: It is incredibly slow. The “cat and mouse” dynamic feels more like a slow shuffle.
- The Repetition: Far too much of the runtime is spent watching the protagonist walk into a room, close a door, and move to the next room.
- The Thrills: Or lack thereof. It fails to generate any real tension.
The Ugly: The Lighting. It is frustratingly dark. For large portions of the film, you will be squinting just to see what is happening.
Should You Watch Push?
Unless you are a die-hard completionist of Shudder Originals, probably not. Push is a thriller without the thrills and a horror without the scares. It squanders a decent performance and a nice location on a tedious, repetitive loop of door-slamming and slow walking. There are far better home invasion movies out there worth your time.
You might also like:
- Mandrake (2022) Review – A Gloomy and Glacial Folk Horror Mystery
- Shattered (2022) Review – A Pointless and Thrill-Free Slog
- A Christmas Horror Story (2015) Review – An Entertaining Festive Anthology
- She Dies Tomorrow (2020) Review – A Repetitive and Pretentious Anxiety Trip
- The Hand That Rocks The Cradle (2025) review: A pointless, tension-free remake
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.






