Followers (2021) Review – A Cringey and Uninspired Influencer Slog
Followers: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A structurally disjointed and creatively bankrupt attempt at modern social media horror that fails to land a single genuine scare. Followers suffers from an identity crisis, struggling to balance its traditional haunted house tropes with a “cheugy” influencer aesthetic that feels hopelessly out of touch. The film relies on a cast of walking stereotypes, from the obnoxious posh boy to the “angry” Scot, none of whom are developed enough to garner any sympathy. While there are fleeting moments of effective satire regarding influencer culture, they are quickly drowned out by laughable special effects and a narrative that borders on the nonsensical. It is a 1.5 star disaster that represents the bottom of the found footage barrel, offering a viewing experience that is more awkward than frightening. Despite some decent performances from Loreece Harrison and Daniel Cahill, the final product is an uninspired slog that should remain firmly in the “unfollowed” list for even the most dedicated horror fans.
Details: Director: Marcus Harben | Cast: Harry Jarvis, Loreece Harrison, Erin Austen, Daniel Cahill | Runtime: 1h 22m | Release Date: 2021
Best for: Viewers looking for “so bad it’s good” background noise or fans of the cast who want to support their early work.
Worth noting: The film’s production was tragically impacted by the illness of director Marcus Harben, which undoubtedly contributed to some of the disjointed elements in the final cut.
Where to Watch: Amazon🛒, Tubi (Free)
Rating: 1.5/5 Stars
(Total lack of scares, stereotypical characters, and an authentic but poorly implemented social media theme.)
Welcome back to Knockout Horror. Today we are reviewing social media themed, British horror movie Followers.
Table of Contents
More social media themed horror
I won’t beat around the bush here: Followers is straight up bad. One of the worst movies I have covered on this site, to be perfectly honest. It follows posh social media influencer Jonty Craig (Harry Jarvis). A recent bigoted rant of Jonty’s was caught on camera, leading to his influencer status diminishing and him becoming disgraced. Desperate to get his popularity back, Jonty begins presenting his life as an online reality show.
“I won’t beat around the bush here: Followers is straight up bad. One of the worst movies I have covered on this site, to be perfectly honest. “
After moving into student accommodation with a couple of other people, he learns that the house has a sordid past and may just be haunted. Keen to profit off of the situation, Jonty sees an opportunity to regain his fame, whatever the cost.
Followers is a mix of found footage and traditional style horror. We mainly follow the rather annoying Jonty around but we also see social media style videos, interviews with fans, footage from the other characters and everything else you would expect from a movie like this. Jonty lives with a bunch of walking, talking, stereotypes.
We have annoying, obnoxious, posh English boy Jonty. Angry Scottish mature student Pete, the busty Northern English chick with daddy issues, Amber, and the smart and sensible one Zauna. It’s something of Scooby Doo-esque presentation of characters with each having a clearly defined, and predictable, personality. These characters are only really placed together to clash and little else. Pete wants to party and fight, Amber wants attention and love, Zauna wants logical explanations and Jonty wants to profit. Simple!
Shoehorned in social media aspect
At its heart, Followers is a rather traditional haunted house story. The social media stuff is shoe horned in purely to make the movie appeal to a younger audience. It is a bunch of recycled horror tropes but if it was done well this movie may have stood out. People may have lauded it for taking a different approach to traditional horror, much in the way that Deadstream did earlier this year. That just isn’t the case, there is very little that this movie does well.
“The social media aspect feels both cheap and inauthentic. Like it was made by someone pushing 50 who thinks they get what the kids want to see. In the words of Gen Z, it all feels a bit cheugy.”
The movie’s main hook, the social media aspect, feels both cheap and inauthentic. Like it was made by someone pushing 50 who thinks they get what the kids want to see. In the words of Gen Z, it all feels a bit cheugy; and I say that as a millennial. The presentation style here is extremely try hard and a little bit off-putting. The crazy thing is, the rest of the movie is so bad that the social media aspect is all the film has to hang its hat on.
The movie is devoid of scares and the plot feels painfully familiar. A story that starts in a fairly interesting manner, quickly falls foul of confusing writing and an overactive narrative. Horror tropes abound. Bangs on the walls, a town with a history of murders, a haunted house, shadows and spectres caught on camera, night vision explorations of basements. You have seen it all before but rarely done this poorly. The stereotypical characters are keen to play to type offering little to care about. There is no subtlety and not an ounce of nuance.
Genuinely awkward at times
Scenes range from being a little poor to laughably bad. A couple of segments stand out for just how ridiculous they are. If I was to say “Ghost dancing on a table complete with excessive strobe lighting”, I am sure I wouldn’t be spoiling too much but you would get a nice sense for just how embarrassing some parts of this movie can be. No amount of editing or special effects could have made some of these scenes work.
Indeed, Harben occasionally touches on important subjects of intimate photo theft and institutional racism. But these themes also fall foul of the lacklustre presentation of the movie. It all feels a bit tacked on and insincere. Followers can, however, evoke a few chuckles here and there. Pete, in particular, earns a giggle or two. There are some clever observations of the vapid and pointless nature of influencer content, as well.
Acting is areal mixed bag
Acting is a mixed bag. Harry Jarvis is a bit awkward as Jonty but maybe that is intentional? He’s a nepo kid: his parents are producers on Followers. Still, he’s acting in a Tubi movie as we speak so it can’t all be bad. I think Loreece Harrison, as Zauna, stands out for her performance. She almost feels a bit out of place compared to the rest of the cast for just how good she is. Daniel Cahill does nail the angry Scottish dude role as well.
“Followers is devoid of scares and the plot feels painfully familiar. You have seen it all before but rarely done this poorly. There is no subtlety and not an ounce of nuance.”
Erin Austen does as much as she can with her very poorly written, and somewhat misogynistic, role. It seems as though she was added for titillation and little else. Rarely do you see so much cleavage in a horror. Veteran actor Nina Wadia is spot on as the quirky, slightly cringey therapist Becky. A fleeting appearance by actual English influencer Tanya Burr is sure to please fans of hers.
A tragic production
Followers has a bit of a tragic history attached to it, a history that I think bears mention. During production of the movie, writer and director Marcus Harben was diagnosed with an aggressive form of cancer. He sadly passed away not long after diagnosis and never got to see this project through. It’s probably fair to say that the death of Marcus impacted the final product that we see here.
It’s a true tragedy. I have lost a number of relatives to cancer including both of my parents. It really sucks and I wish I could praise this movie more but it is what it is. We’ll consider this paragraph as a tribute to Marcus Harben. Rest in peace dude. Harben collaborated with illustrator Dave Turbitt when he received his diagnoses. Together, they made the comic Weird Things That Happened When I Got The F*****g Cancer. I thoroughly encourage you to check it out, it is both touching and hilarious.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Loreece Harrison: Gives a genuinely professional performance as Zauna that feels entirely out of place in such a poorly produced film.
- Satirical Moments: There are some sharp, albeit brief, observations regarding the vapid nature of influencer content and online vanity.
- Daniel Cahill: Nails the “angry Scottish student” archetype with enough energy to earn a few legitimate chuckles.
The Bad
- Zero Scares: The film fails to build any tension, relying on tired tropes that have been executed much better elsewhere.
- Stereotypical Writing: The characters are old-fashioned caricatures rather than people, making it impossible to care about their safety.
- Technical Quality: The special effects and editing in several sequences, particularly the “ghost dance,” are embarrassingly amateurish.
The Ugly: The “Table Dance” Scene. A moment involving excessive strobe lighting and a “dancing” spectre that is so laughably bad it threatens to turn the whole film into a parody.
Should You Watch Followers?
No. It is a 1.5 star mess that offers nothing to horror fans or general viewers alike. While it attempts to capitalize on modern trends, it feels hopelessly dated and poorly executed. You are better off re-watching Deadstream or even a mediocre *Paranormal Activity* sequel. This is one social media event you definitely want to miss.
You might also like:
- May (2002) Review – A Wickedly Funny and Tragic Cult Classic
- Dropbear (2025) Review – It’s Ridiculous and I Love It!
- Don’t Move (2024) review – A Tense Netflix Thriller With A Paralytic Twist
- Good Boy (2025) review – A horror movie with a paw-sitive twist
- Fright Night (1985) Review – A Masterclass in 80s Vampire Horror
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.









