Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva (2023) Review – A Disjointed and Rushed Sidestep
Horror in the High Desert 2: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A disappointing and disjointed follow up that lacks the focus and creeping dread of its predecessor. Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva abandons the compelling single subject study of Gary Hinge in favour of multiple, underdeveloped narratives that feel like filler. While Dutch Marich manages to capture a few unsettling visuals in the final act, the film is hampered by a chaotic structure and a lack of character connection. Suziey Block remains the production’s strongest asset, but even her returning reporter cannot save a script that feels like a rushed attempt to capitalise on the first movie’s cult success. It is a 2.2 star sidestep that will likely only satisfy die hard found footage completionists.
Details: Director: Dutch Marich | Cast: Suziey Block, Solveig Helene, Brooke Bradshaw, David Morales | Runtime: 1h 14m | Release Date: 6 March 2023
Best for: Mockumentary fans who want “more of the same” regardless of quality and those keeping up with the High Desert lore.
Worth noting: Despite the title focusing on Minerva, her story only takes up a portion of the film before pivoting to a completely different disappearance.
Where to Watch: Amazon🛒
Rating: 2.2/5 Stars
(Suziey Block’s performance, a few creepy shots, disjointed structure)
Welcome to Knockout Horror and to another entry into our series of Found Footage Horror Movies Suggested by Reddit. Unfortunately, we are going to have to put another tick in the “Bad Found Footage Suggestion” box today. Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva just didn’t do anything for me. Not to mention you can’t find this one for free on YouTube, either. Bummer!
Table of Contents
It’s more of the same
We reviewed Horror in the High Desert just yesterday. Reddit’s found footage community references these films frequently and the third entry in the series, Horror in the High Desert 3: Firewatch, is just around the corner. With this in mind, we thought this was the perfect opportunity to catch up on what was going on. Hell, I am a huge mockumentary fan, as well, so what better way to fill a few hours?
“Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva simply chooses to recycle the original movie’s format with two far less interesting stories.”
We found the first movie to be a fairly watchable mockumentary that borrows heavily from Lake Mungo and the real-life disappearance of YouTuber Kenny Veach. The movie does absolutely nothing new but is pretty interesting and quite creepy in places.
A sequel updating us on the disappearance of the first movie’s main subject, Gary Hinge, was promised at the end. This movie, however, does not deliver on said promise. In fact, Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva is far more of a sidestep than anything. Placing the focus on the similar disappearances of a mature student known as Minerva (Solveig Helene) and another woman, Ameliana (Brooke Bradshaw), who broke down alongside a highway close by.
Apparently these cases could be connected to the disappearance of Gary Hinge. But any promise of intrigue is lost as Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva simply chooses to recycle the original movie’s format with two far less interesting stories. In this entry, writer, director Dutch Marich has even managed to introduce a few new issues not present in the original.
But somehow less
Watching this movie straight after its predecessor really highlighted some major issues. Namely how much less interesting the two stories at the centre of Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva are compared to that of Gary Hinge in the first movie. Gary’s story had far more build and we learned much more about the character in question.
“Gary’s story had far more build and we learned much more about the character. Here, our time is split between two individual subjects.”
Here, our time is split between two individual subjects. Meaning we learn less about each of them and never really manage to connect with either in any meaningful way. In fact, we spend only mere minutes learning about the second character before her story is done. It’s hard to shake the feeling that Marich was in a rush to get to the film’s closing stanza. An admitted highlight of the movie but still less effective than the actual night-time found footage scenes in the original.
I feel strongly that this movie should have been a side story rather than a sequel. Perhaps even a series of shorts. The stories in question here are just not that interesting. On top of that, the stories are told with an almost haphazard and chaotic presentation that just wasn’t present in the first movie. The first movie had structure and felt fairly well thought out. Minerva dashes around confusingly from one point to the next.
A bevy of new issues
I was constantly under the impression that I was watching a collection of “spooky” sequences poorly sewn together with underdeveloped stories. Minerva’s story serves, purely, as a way to get to some “creepy” analogue recordings of a supposed killer. Making the title character feel like little more than an after thought. This leaves the next character’s story to do a lot of heavy lifting but that story felt even less well developed. In fact, I would go as far as to say it felt like nothing more than filler designed to extend the movie’s run time.
“It is a big step down from the original and feels massively rushed. Stories are dull, poorly connected and lacking in development.”
Suziey Block returns as reporter Gal Roberts and, once again, feels like the only true actor in the entire production. It is her character that brings these stories together, highlighting the possible link between the disappearances. But the documentary style format here feels much weaker than the first movie. Characters are introduced right at the beginning that seem somewhat confused about their place in the story. Only for them to be reintroduced an hour later as a disconnected voice with no reminder of who the hell they are.
As mentioned earlier, the story bounces around with no rhyme or reason making for some confusion in parts. The threads that tie the individual stories together are barely existent. Meaning sequence after sequence feels disconnected.
Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva also forgoes much of the documentary style interviews. Instead opting to go with personal vlogs and dull found footage scenes. Something which adds to the generally unprofessional feel of the production, as a whole. This is a big step down from the original. I can’t help but feel it was little more than a rushed cash grab. The bevy of clearly fake reviews doing the rounds add credence to this, in my opinion.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Suziey Block: Brings a sense of legitimacy and professional polish to the mockumentary format once again.
- Atmosphere: Marich still knows how to make the vast, silent Nevada desert feel like a hostile and dangerous place.
- Closing Sequence: The final found footage segment offers a few genuine, low budget chills that hark back to the original’s strengths.
The Bad
- Disjointed Narrative: The stories are poorly connected and the film jumps between subjects with very little rhythm or reason.
- Underdeveloped Characters: By splitting the focus, we never get to know the victims well enough to care about their fates.
- Rushed Feel: From the editing to the script, the entire production feels like it was hurried through to meet demand.
The Ugly: The “filler” sensation. Significant portions of the runtime are dedicated to uninteresting vlogs that add nothing to the overarching mystery.
Should You Watch Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva?
Probably not. Unless you are already invested in the series and need to see every chapter before the third release, this is a skippable entry. It lacks the cohesive storytelling and genuine mystery that made the first film a surprise hit among found footage fans.
You might also like:
- Dream Home (2010) Review – A Visceral and Stylish Satire of the Housing Market
- Hallow Road (2025) review – A road trip into trauma and boredom
- Final Destination 2 (2003) review – Why we are all scared of logging trucks
- Megan is Missing (2011) Review – A Repulsive and Pointless Exercise in Misery
- The Transfiguration (2016) Review – A Gritty and Depressing Urban Vampire Study
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.
