V/H/S (2012) Review – A Gritty and Visceral Found Footage Time Capsule
V/H/S: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A raw, chaotic, and undeniably influential anthology that effectively revitalised the found footage sub-genre for the digital age. V/H/S (2012) succeeds as a showcase for a “who’s who” of modern horror directors, offering a visceral and unapologetically gritty collection of shorts that trade high-budget polish for DIY ingenuity. The film is hampered by some of the most egregious found footage tropes, including nauseating camera shake and a surplus of unlikeable, hyper-sexed protagonists that may alienate casual viewers. Despite its flaws, the practical effects are gnarly and the concepts are often genuinely imaginative. This 3 star effort is a technical curiosity that launched a decade-spanning franchise and remains a mandatory watch for students of 21st-century horror. It is an imperfect, yet essential, time capsule of indie horror ambition. It is a mixed bag that still packs a punch.
Details: Directors: Adam Wingard, David Bruckner, Ti West, et al. | Cast: Joe Swanberg, Sophie Takal, Helen Rogers | Runtime: 1h 56m | Release Date: 2012
Best for: Fans of gritty found footage, anthology enthusiasts, and those interested in seeing the early work of modern horror masters.
Worth noting: The film’s premiere at Sundance famously led to two audience members requiring medical attention due to the visceral nature of the first segment.
Where to Watch: VOD, Amazon🛒
Rating: 3/5 Stars
(A landmark lo-fi anthology that launched a franchise; while wildly inconsistent in quality, it remains a visceral and historically significant showcase for indie horror talent.)
Welcome to Knockout Horror. Today we are checking out the horror anthology V/H/S from 2012.
Table of Contents
A found footage anthology classic
V/H/S is a found footage horror anthology in the style of the old Tales From the Crypt movies and TV shows. We have a collection of stories all loosely connected together by a frame narrative story called Tape 56. This is a movie that spawned an entire franchise, with the V/H/S movies still appearing almost annually 14 years later (updating this review in 2026).
Tape 56, directed by Adam Wingard, focuses on a gang of criminals and their exploits as they stumble upon the tapes shown here.
The stories are Amateur Night by David Bruckner, The Second Honeymoon by Ti West, Tuesday the 17th by Glenn McQuaid, The Sick Thing That Happened To Emily When She Was Younger by Joe Swanberg and 10/31/98 by the collective Radio Silence.
“V/H/S is a found footage horror anthology in the style of the old Tales From the Crypt. This is a movie that spawned an entire franchise, with new entries still appearing almost annually 14 years later.”
Amateur Night sees a group of frat bros on a night out where they encounter a sexy siren with deadly intentions. The Second Honeymoon follows a couple taking a vacation unwittingly finding themselves the victim of a stalker. Tuesday the 17th sees a group of friends head to a lake for some fun in the sun, only to encounter a strange murderous creature.
The Sick Thing That Happened To Emily When She Was Younger follows a couple as they chat on webcam, attempting to uncover what is the cause of the strange things happening to Emily. And 10/31/98 sees a group of friends heading to a Halloween party where the props seem just a little too authentic.
A mixed bag
The difficulty in recommending V/H/S comes from the difference in quality between the stories. Amateur Night and The Sick Thing That Happened To Emily When She Was Younger are clearly the best stories. Amateur Night is both amusing and quite shocking in parts. It actually went on to become a movie in its own right — Siren. Unfortunately Siren did not manage to capture what made Amateur Night so good and was, in fact, utter dog shite.
The Sick Thing That Happened To Emily When She Was Younger has a really compelling plot, a few decent scares, an unsettling tone and some genuinely decent acting from Helen Rogers. This is one of those shorts that could have worked really well as an actual movie. The scares could have been given more time to develop, the relationship between the two could have been expanded on, and the story left to simmer for awhile.
The rest of the segments, however, are just nowhere near as interesting. The adjoining story is particularly bad and uninteresting. The theme of overly sexed up young men doing aggressive things is a little too overplayed in V/H/S. The main segment is the one most guilty of this. Tuesday the 17th is awful and features absolutely terrible acting. It is given far too much time and features a cast of horribly annoying characters. If they were aiming to create a villain you could cheer for when he brutalises a group of assholes then mission accomplished.
Time to breathe
Some of the stories here just needed a bit more time in the pot so to speak. They were severely undercooked. The Second Honeymoon kind of falls into this category but I am not so sure director Ti West could have managed to do much else with it. He likes to meander with his storytelling and I think we would have gotten more of the same here, just extended over an hour and a half. As it stands, it’s just a boring story with little to cling onto.
10/31/98 felt like something of a rinse and repeat of Amateur Night. Sure, the story is different but the frat boy theme was well and truly played out at this point. Perhaps as a full movie we would have a chance to develop the characters a bit more. Perhaps the history of the house could have been expanded on? Either way, I don’t know if this would have helped as the segment just felt a bit generic and boring.
“Amateur Night and The Sick Thing That Happened To Emily When She Was Younger are clearly the best stories. Emily has a compelling plot, decent scares, and an unsettling tone.”
This is an issue with Anthology Horror as a whole. You will likely want more time from the good segments and the segments with potential. Bad segments will feel as though they are dragging on. It is worth pointing out, as well, that just because a segment seems like a good idea for a movie doesn’t mean the director will do a good job. Siren is proof of that though director David Bruckner did not take the helm on that production.
Violent and hyper sexed
Not exactly the tagline you want to put on your Tinder profile. V/H/S is very violent, features a lot of gore, and is hyper sexualised. There is a lot of injury detail and some gnarly practical effects. Amateur Night stands out in this regard. There is obviously tons of language, drug use, and sexual references. Most of the characters are totally unlikeable as well. The adjoining segment, in particular, features an awful group of dudes that I doubt many viewers could give two shits about.
I think this is also worth pointing out as some viewers hate nudity in movies. In my opinion, nudity has an important place in horror movies. I think, used correctly, it can add a sense of vulnerability to protagonists or be used for shock value to add to the horror.
“Found footage and horror anthologies make perfect bed mates. This format offers a wider audience the chance to witness brilliant directors in a much more easily digested way.”
I rarely think horror nudity is out of place outside of some of the 80s pointless stuff. V/H/S, however, feels like the producers decided they were making a movie and asked “How many girls are getting their tits out in this?” and the reply was “Yes!“. There is tons of nudity in V/H/S and a lot of it is pointless.
Found footage anthologies
Found footage and horror anthologies make perfect bed mates. There have been a fair few and that’s probably due to the low cost of filming. If you have an idea for a horror movie and don’t have a lot of money, why not knock out a short on a handheld camera? It works well and keeps at least some cohesion between the stories. On top of that, this format offers a wider audience the chance to witness some brilliant directors in a much more easily digested way. Something that horror anthologies are perfect for.

V/H/S is, however, particularly guilty of some of the most egregious found footage sins. Shaky camera is everywhere and particularly bad in certain segments. Special effects are, at times, pretty terrible. Filming quality is very grainy and can be hard to watch and some of the content is very obviously improvised. If you are a found footage aficionado then you know what to expect. Many people, however, will be put off before even getting ten minutes into the movie.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Stellar Segments: “Amateur Night” and “Emily” are standout horror shorts that show exactly how found footage can be used to create lasting dread.
- Future Legends: The film serves as a fantastic early gallery for directors like Ti West and David Bruckner before they hit the big time.
- Gory Practical Effects: The commitment to visceral, tactile gore is impressive and adds a layer of authentic nastiness to the experience.
The Bad
- Wildly Uneven: As with most anthologies, the quality drops significantly between segments, with some feeling undercooked or just plain boring.
- Unlikeable Characters: Almost every protagonist is a “frat boy” archetype that is difficult to root for or even care about.
- Nausea-Inducing: The shaky camera work is at its most egregious here, potentially causing actual physical discomfort for some viewers.
The Ugly: Pointless Nudity. The film feels strangely obsessed with getting its female cast undressed for no narrative reason, leaning into an outdated “boys club” vibe.
Should You Watch V/H/S?
Yes, for the sake of horror history. It is a 3 star film that provided the blueprint for the next decade of found footage anthologies. If you can stomach the shaky visuals and skip past the weaker segments (looking at you, “Tuesday the 17th”), there is a lot of dark, creative fun to be had here. It’s a messy, violent, and often brilliant experiment that proved found footage still had plenty of life left in it. Just keep a bucket nearby for the motion sickness.
You might also like:
- Super Dark Times (2017) Review – A Dreamy and Disturbing 90s Thriller
- Kids’ Christmas Horror – 5 Movies to Watch With the Family
- The Texas Witch (2025) review – Better than the IMDb score suggests?
- Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva (2023) Review – A Disjointed and Rushed Sidestep
- The Frights Before Christmas: 25 Festive Horror Movies Ranked
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.









