V/H/S/85 (2023) Review – A Solid And Stylish Return For The Found Footage Anthology
V/H/S/85: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A surprisingly consistent entry in the long-running found footage series that finally ditches the “skip-worthy” segments. V/H/S/85 thrives on its high production values and a genuine commitment to its grimy, mid-80s aesthetic. While no anthology is ever perfectly even, this collection manages to maintain a solid floor of quality, anchored by Mike P. Nelson’s standout No Wake and Scott Derrickson’s analog-horror tinged Dreamkill. It perfectly captures the period’s obsession with technology, cults, and cosmic dread. It is a 3-star horror highlight that, while predictable in parts, offers enough practical gore and retro charm to keep genre fans thoroughly entertained. Easily the most watchable V/H/S film in years.
Details: Directors: David Bruckner, Scott Derrickson, Gigi Saul Guerrero, Natasha Kermani, Mike P. Nelson | Runtime: 1h 50m | Release Date: 6 October 2023
Best for: Found footage enthusiasts, 80s horror lovers, and anyone who enjoys high-quality practical effects in their anthologies.
Worth noting: This is the first film in the series where segments (No Wake and Ambrosia) are directly connected narratively beyond the wraparound story.
Where to Watch: Amazon🛒, Shudder
Rating: 3/5 Stars
(High production standards, fantastic practical effects, no weak segments)
Welcome to Knockout Horror. Today’s movie is 2023’s V/H/S/85.
Believe it or not, I have watched every iteration in this series of Horror Anthologies but only ever reviewed two of them — V/H/S and V/H/S/99. Part of that is down to the fact that I watched most of them before I even had a horror review website. And part of it is down to the fact that they are all fairly uneven. So how does V/H/S/85 hold up? Let’s take a look.
Table of Contents
Catching up on a huge series
The V/H/S series is six movies deep, believe it or not. Another release, a sci-fi horror themed anthology, is set for October this year. So I figured it was probably time for me to catch up on some reviews. If we are being perfectly honest, I think the majority of horror fans can probably take or leave the series, as a whole. V/H/S has a bit of a cult following but none stand out tremendously. Even with the bevy of well-known horror directors attached to them.
The majority seem to consider V/H/S/2 to be the series’ best entry. But I probably prefer the first movie or even 2022’s V/H/S/99. V/H/S: Viral, in my opinion, is one of the worst horror anthologies I have ever seen. And V/H/S/94 has slipped my mind completely. Though I believe it is the most critically well-regarded entry.
More of the same
V/H/S/85 is more of the same. It crams six stories into a little under two hours. Though one of the stories, Total Copy, is segmented between the others as a sort of wraparound feature. And another two, No Wake and Ambrosia, are connected in setting and theme.
“Everything is presented as if played directly off of a worn-out VHS tape.”
Naturally, everything is filmed in an old-school, grainy, VHS style, 4:3 aspect ratio with the exception of Dreamkill which is shown in 16:9 widescreen. We even have the occasional commercial spliced in, ala WNUF Halloween Special, and everything is presented as if played directly off of a worn-out VHS tape.
Total Copy, directed by The Ritual‘s David Bruckner, acts as the wraparound story and follows a team of scientists studying a shapeshifting creature known as Rory. No Wake, directed by Wrong Turn‘s (2021) Mike P. Nelson, sees a group of friends heading to the lake for some fun in the sun. Only to find their day ruined when a sniper takes aim at their boat.
God of Death, directed by Gigi Saul Guerrero, is set during the 1985 Mexico City earthquake and sees a group of rescuers attempting to find their way out of a collapsed building while inadvertently entering the underground resting place of an Aztec God. TKNOGD, directed by Natasha Kermani, follows a performance artist attempting to summon the god of technology in a virtual reality world.
Mike P. Nelson’s second segment, Ambrosia, sees a family celebrating their teenage daughter’s completion, and filming, of a traditional family ritual. And the final segment, Dreamkill, directed by The Black Phone‘s Scott Derrickson, follows a police detective attempting to find out the identity of a brutal serial killer.
High production standards throughout
Something that stands out about V/H/S/85 is how high the production values are. Naturally, these are a bunch of directors well-versed in filmmaking and it shows. Everything feels polished and high quality. Practical effects are amazing, in parts. Acting is solid throughout and pacing is generally decent.
Each of the segments has its own unique style. The only thing tying them all together is some of the 80s themes present and the VHS cassette tape presentation. Each story focuses on something that was a legitimate fear in that era. Crazy cults were a big thing in the 80s, as were alien creatures and sadistic serial killers. The ’85 Mexico earthquake was one of the most significant events in the country’s history and fear of technology causing job losses and worsening society was very prevalent back then.
Different strokes for different folks
Total Copy plays out almost like a documentary, with footage of the scientists conducting their work and an all-knowing voice relating the fears of certain scientists. No Wake is framed as a camcorder recording of friends having fun at the lake, with the camera being passed around from person to person. God of Death starts off as a Mexican television news show before turning into traditional found footage, with the surviving cameraman refusing to stop filming.
TKNOGD is shown from two video cameras recording a woman’s solo performance art show with occasional glimpses into the virtual reality world. Dreamkill is a mix of distorted Super 8 camera footage recorded by the killer, police security camera footage and interviews. And Ambrosia plays out as home camcorder footage.
Each of the styles works well for its respective story. Though I would argue that Dreamkill‘s will appeal to more people simply due to being a bit higher quality and a bit more varied.
No truly bad segments
This has to be a first for the V/H/S series, right? There are, legitimately, no bad segments in V/H/S/85. All have their plus points and all are legitimately watchable. If I had to point to one segment as being the weakest, I would have to say it is TKNOGD. The concept is interesting and the Lawnmower Man style aesthetics will please some. But it just feels like filler and far less fleshed-out than the other segments.
“This has to be a first for the V/H/S series, right? There are, legitimately, no bad segments in V/H/S/85.”
The wraparound story, Total Copy, is pretty dull, in my opinion. It takes a long time to go anywhere and ends with a bit of a whimper. God of Death falls somewhere in the middle, with the Mexican daytime television styling being a lot of fun before it spends the rest of its runtime crawling through tunnels. I really enjoyed the end, though.
Dreamkill is great but goes on a little too long. It could do with being a little tighter but I am sure people will appreciate the almost analog horror stylings of some of the scenes. There is full movie potential here and the story was fairly compelling.
A standout segment
No Wake stands as the best segment in the bunch and, I would argue, one of the best V/H/S segments ever. There is definite full movie potential here. Practical effects are amazing, the setup is simple but effective, the filming style works perfectly and it is actually quite shocking in parts. The way this segment ties into the later segment, Ambrosia, is very creative. Though I can’t help but feel like it will leave people unsatisfied and wanting more. I doubt many will be left feeling like this was a fitting conclusion to one of the better segments in V/H/S history.
All in all, this is one of the better V/H/S movies yet. You have to temper your expectations, of course. A good V/H/S movie is still an average horror. But there are enough decent segments here to keep you entertained and enough polish to place it a few steps above most anthology horror.
“For an interesting and varied way to fill a couple of hours with horror goodness, V/H/S/85 is one of the better options.”
Some people are going to hate the 80s aesthetic and some will be seriously put off by the grainy image quality and retro stylings. The movie is predictable throughout, as well. But, as far as these types of movies go, V/H/S/85 is pretty damn watchable.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Consistency: For the first time in the series, every segment is at least watchable, with no major drop-off in quality.
- Practical Effects: The gore and creature design are top-tier, reminding us why these directors are so well-regarded.
- No Wake: A genuinely shocking and original segment that stands as one of the best in the entire franchise.
The Bad
- Predictability: Many of the “twists” within the segments follow standard horror blueprints and are easily spotted.
- Wraparound Story: Total Copy is a bit of a slow-moving dud that doesn’t quite live up to its science-fiction premise.
The Ugly: The “God of Technology” VR. The dated Lawnmower Man-style graphics in the TKNOGD segment are an intentional eyesore that captures 80s tech-fears perfectly.
Should You Watch V/H/S/85?
Yes, especially if you have been following the series. It’s an easy, fun, and varied way to spend a couple of hours. It nails the 80s aesthetic without feeling too much like a caricature, and the practical effects alone make it worth the price of admission on Shudder.
You might also like:
- The Ugly Stepsister (2025) review – Cinderella meets Cronenberg
- In a Violent Nature (2024) Ending Explained – The Bear Story & Locket Meaning
- I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1997) review – So bad it’s good?
- Invited (2024) Review – A Tense But Ultimately Absurd Digital Nightmare
- House on Eden (2025) review – Influencers take on found footage
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.












