Baghead (2024) Review – A Disappointing Waste Of A Creepy Concept
Baghead: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A classic case of a brilliant short-film concept failing to survive the transition to a feature-length runtime. Baghead starts with a fantastic premise that echoes the success of Talk to Me, but it quickly squanders its potential by pivoting into a generic, predictable monster movie. While Freya Allan delivers a strong lead performance and the antagonist is visually creepy, the film relies too heavily on jump scares and lazy writing. The fascinating psychological weight of speaking with the deceased is abandoned in favour of a run of the mill Hollywood horror formula. It is a 2-star disappointment that feels threadbare and ultimately forgettable.
Details: Director: Alberto Corredor | Cast: Freya Allan, Jeremy Irvine, Anne Müller, Ruby Barker | Runtime: 1h 34m | Release Date: 26 January 2024
Best for: Teenagers looking for an easy to digest horror or fans of Freya Allan who want to see her carry a feature film.
Worth noting: The film is based on Corredor’s own 2017 short film, which was much better received for its concise and punchy horror delivery.
Where to Watch: Amazon🛒
Rating: 2/5 Stars
(Strong lead acting, creepy antagonist, generic and predictable plot)
Welcome to Knockout Horror and to our review of Alberto Corredor’s Baghead from 2024. Can I start off by pointing out how much I hate that title? Where I’m from, a baghead is someone who will rob their own granny blind for a bag of scag. In the world of movie making; a baghead is a woman who lives in the basement of a pub and can grant people the chance to speak with the dead.
Table of Contents
A monkey’s paw horror theme
Well, that’s the basic outline, anyways. Baghead follows the story of Iris (Freya Allan). Down on her luck and recently evicted from her flat, Iris sees no way out of her tough situation. After learning of the death of her estranged father, she heads over to Berlin to tie up some loose ends. While there, she learns that she has inherited the deed to an old pub.
Little does she realise, the pub harbours a dark secret in the form of a woman who lives in the basement. This woman can help people communicate with deceased loved ones. The only catch is that, once you sign the deed, you are tied to her forever, whether you like it or not.

Wow! What a great idea for a horror movie. Of course, it’s not a completely original idea. Talk to Me did something similar only a couple of years ago and other movies have approached the concept in one way or another. But I would be lying if I said that I wasn’t immediately drawn in.
This is one of those stories that has the potential to go in so many different directions. Not to mention a story with so much potential for some serious scares.
So much potential but so disappointing
Unfortunately, Baghead chooses to go in the direction of completely squandering said potential and leaving the viewer utterly disappointed. The idea at the heart of Baghead is repeatedly pushed to one side. Instead of focusing more on talking to the dead and creating a creepy psychological horror, Corredor chooses to turn the movie into a basic, run of the mill, supernatural monster horror. It’s such a tremendous waste of a really fascinating concept.
“Baghead is a pretty creepy character and Anne Müller’s physical performance is sufficiently otherworldly.”
Baghead kicks off with some of your usual human drama that drives a lot of horror. It then quickly gets into indulging in the driving force behind the story; the communicating with the dead. Baghead is a pretty creepy character and Anne Müller’s physical performance is sufficiently otherworldly. She comes crawling out of the wall in admirably scary fashion and most horror fans will probably enjoy much of the build-up. So far so good.
We see a character using Baghead to talk to a deceased loved one and the execution is, actually, pretty cool. The loved one wakes up confused and scared. A really nice touch to emphasise the strangeness of the situation. But the movie is in such a rush to get to the bullcrap that the shit hits the fan almost immediately.
From this point on, we are just in a straight sprint to the finish. The intriguing human drama element and communicating with the dead is pushed to the side. Sure, we do see a few more interactions with deceased people, but they are predictable and rather tame. Outside of one particular encounter, Corredor never manages to tap into just how much depth the concept really has.
Just a boring monster movie
The rest of Baghead devolves into a simple monster movie. The fact that said monster can help people communicate with the dead barely even matters. It might as well be a werewolf or a simple witch down there for how little is done with that fact.
“The intriguing human drama element and communicating with the dead is pushed to the side.”
Expect predictability, jump scares and for the movie to quickly turn into a very run of the mill Hollywood style horror. And, like most Hollywood horror, it’s just not that scary and really not that interesting.
Baghead began life as a 15-minute short back in 2017. Something which helps explain just how threadbare the story here feels. Stretching these concepts out to full length feature movies often fails. What works as a creepy burst of horror goodness doesn’t always work as a drawn out tale. The scares wear off quick, the plot lacks development and the decision to not focus on the more interesting parts of the story takes an enormous toll on the film, as a whole.
On the plus side
Focusing on some of the positives, Freya Allan is fantastic as main character Iris. She is one of those actors that manages to make acting look effortless. Her performance is very natural and believable throughout. Jeremy Irvine, as Neil, is similarly capable and both add some quality to the movie.
Cale Finot’s cinematography is occasionally fantastic. Baghead is, for the most part, a great looking film. Set design is sometimes great and there are decent shots scattered throughout. Sound design is okay and not too obstructive and some of the communicating with the dead scenes are genuinely interesting.
And more negatives
The character of Katie feels utterly redundant and only there to pad things out a bit. On top of that, actor Ruby Barker doesn’t bring much, at all, to the role. With her performance feeling every bit like that of an English Soap Opera bit character. Writing is tremendously lazy with some of the dialogue being remedial and even farcical in parts. Characters constantly break the very simple rules provided purely to create drama and scares. Something which actually gets annoying pretty fast.
The character of Baghead is seriously underdeveloped. Her backstory is lazily put together and rushed through just to give some lore to the character. Very little thought is actually put into her motivations and her actions feel strangely inconsistent at times. CGI effects are terrible, genuinely early 2000s level in parts and completely overused. A few of the shots share this problem, as well, with one in particular looking like it was ripped right out of a 90s Hellraiser sequel, plastic looking set and all. Baghead is, unfortunately, a real mixed bag throughout.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Freya Allan: Gives a natural and believable performance as Iris, making her difficult situation feel authentic.
- The Concept: The idea of a creature in a pub basement that acts as a bridge to the dead is inherently fascinating and creepy.
- Anne Müller: Her physical performance as the creature provides the few legitimate chills the movie has to offer.
The Bad
- Formulaic Writing: The story follows the most basic horror blueprints, ignoring the depth of its own premise.
- Inconsistent Logic: Characters frequently break the established rules purely to move the plot towards a jump scare.
- Underdeveloped Lore: The backstory of the creature feels rushed and lacks the impact needed to make the audience care.
The Ugly: The CGI effects. Some of the digital work looks distractingly dated, pulling the viewer out of what should be a gritty, atmospheric setting.
Should You Watch Baghead?
Only if you are a completionist or have a very high tolerance for generic supernatural horror. While it isn’t the worst film of the year, it is one of the most disappointing given the strength of the original idea. You are better off watching Talk to Me again for a superior take on similar themes.
You might also like:
- Red Snow (2021) Review – A Light and Festive Vampire Rom-Com
- Home Movie (2008) Review – A Bleak and Disturbing Found Footage Chiller
- The Den (2013) Review – A Chilling and Effective Screenlife Slasher
- I Am a Hero (2015) review: The best zombie movie you’ve never seen
- Forest of Death (2023) Review – A Formulaic and Dull Tubi Cash-Grab
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.










