Horror in the High Desert 3: Firewatch (2024) Movie Review - Found Footage Suggested by Reddit

Welcome to Knockout Horror and to another addition in our series of Found Footage Horror Movies Suggested by Reddit. Doesn’t capitalising every word of that look dumb? Anyways, we have been checking out some of the found footage movies that Reddit loves. Today’s entry is the uber recent Horror in the High Desert 3: Firewatch.

Still Struggling With This

Being a bit of a FF buff (a buFF, perhaps?), myself. I didn’t think I would find much new to talk about here and, to be honest, that has been exactly the case. Most of the movies that Reddit talks about are the very same ones everyone has seen a million times. The usual suspects, if you will. But one of the movies I had missed was Horror in the High Desert. Now, don’t get me wrong, this isn’t some obscure title. In fact, it is one of the more talked about found footage horror movies in recent years. I just never bothered to check it out.

Naturally, when putting together a feature on movies that Reddit loves to rave about. This series, obviously, was going to be one that stood out. I mean, they never shut up about it. I think there is a new thread every other day. Even more frequently, in fact, since the release of the third movie. So I really had no choice. The thing is, I just don’t get it. I don’t know what people love about these movies.

Not Always Good to Recycle

Horror in the High Desert is okay. Like, the definition of an average horror. The story is fairly compelling and the presentation works, for the most part. It doesn’t have many new ideas and the story is very clearly stolen from the case of missing YouTuber Kenny Veach. But if you know nothing about that case and enjoy the mockumentary format. You may just have a decent time with it. It does just enough to recommend for a specific group of fans.

Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva, however, felt like recycling. It had no new ideas, a weakening of the mockumentary format and a far less interesting story than the first one. It was very clear that director Dutch Marich was attempting to stretch the formula to get a bit more out of it.

If Horror in the High Desert was a person stuck in the middle of nowhere, with no water, forced to drink their own pee. Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva was the result of another person drinking that person’s already recycled piss in an attempt to extract some non-toxic hydration out of it.

Way More of the Same

You can probably guess where I am going with this. Horror in the High Desert 3: Firewatch is way more of the same. Only with far less substance than both of its predecessors and far less in the way of scares. If there wasn’t much water left in that pee before there is none at all now. It is pure salt and bodily waste. 

If Minerva’s lack of cohesion with the original title was frustrating. Firewatch’s lack of story progression is, probably, most accurately described as infuriating. The story of Firewatch follows social media influencer Oscar Mendoza (Marco Antonio Parra); the guy we see at the end of Minerva.

Mendoza, after dealing with alcohol abuse, has a renewed lease on life and his new high comes from, ermm, investigating disappearances, I guess? So, determined to unravel the mystery behind the vanishing of the first movie’s subject Gary Hinge (Eric Mencis). Oscar heads to the desert, camera in hand, to film his journey.

Obviously some bad shit goes down and Oscar finds himself in a bit of trouble. Firewatch focuses on what happened to Oscar. It’s the same thing as the other two. Documentary style interviews laced in with a few bits of found footage captured by Oscar. In fact, it is paced almost exactly the same as the previous movies. Right down to saving the first person camera jump scare crap until the last few scenes. This formula is old and, worst of all, Marich has found a way to stretch it to another future film. Firewatch answers virtually none of the questions posed by the first film and introduces a few new ones of its own.

Still Has The Same Issues

The things that Marich did well in the first two movies, he does well here, for the most part. The world building, some of the cinematography, spooky locations, the general uneasy vibe etc. But, by the same token, Firewatch has all of the same issues as the first two movies. There’s no growth here. Just a distinct sense of a filmmaker coasting on what he knows best. The mockumentary setup is basic and misses a lot of what makes most documentaries cohesive, and easy to follow, pieces of narrative.

Disembodied voices play over random b-roll with no names to identify them. Characters are thrown into the mix haphazardly with no consistent point of reference to provide context as to who the hell they are. Interview subjects repeat the same points with different words in an impressive act of perpetual tautology. Giant leaps of logic are required to even put together the pieces presented and links between topics feel loose at best.

Horror in the High desert always provokes a feeling in me that the director has never actually watched documentaries. It’s like they caught Lake Mungo on a streaming service and completely copied their blueprint while missing the subtle nuance that is so important in this format. All three of the movies just feel messy. And I say that as someone who has watched a ton of mockumentaries and considers themself a pretty big fan. 

Worth Mentioning

There’s only one moment in Firewatch that could be considered “scary”. The other two movies seem to balance the scares a lot better. Even if they don’t land with all viewers. Firewatch focuses far more on the documentary format and attempts to get by, on the horror front, with mere suggestion and atmosphere. It doesn’t really work, at least for me. The last ten minutes may get some people but I found it very lacking compared to its predecessors. 

Acting has taken a big dip in this movie. Marco Parra, as Oscar, is very capable and a fairly interesting character but still falls foul of the “you know” bug. Suziey Block, again, feels like the most capable member of the cast. A few of the performances here are extremely weak and all of them look as though they are attempting to remember lines. There’s a distinct “thousand yard” stare on many cast members that suggests they aren’t at all comfortable trying to act naturally in front of the camera. Sure, that’s also present in documentaries, as a whole, but it just looks wooden, here.

Should You Watch Horror in the High Desert 3: Firewatch?

Honestly, no, I don’t think you should watch Horror in the High Desert 3: Firewatch. It may seem like I am being harsh but this movie completely recycles the tired format from the first two movies. Brings absolutely nothing new to the table. Is far less interesting than the others and features almost nothing in the way of scares. Firewatch answers no questions and barely progresses the story of Gary Hinge. It can best be described as lore padding.

Marich likes to interact with his fans and is a pretty accessible dude. With this, he has found an audience that is not only loyal but willing to pay money to rent his movies. They fiercely defend the series and are very vocal. He is going to stretch this story as far as it will go and who can blame him? Expect movie 4 next year and for this series to go up to 5 or 6. If you absolutely love the first two and simply want more of the same then go for it. If you are completely new to mockumentaries you may enjoy the format for its novelty factor. But there is very little to recommend to other horror fans.