Scream (1996) review – The movie that saved the horror genre
Scream: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: It’s the movie that saved the horror genre. Scream remains a masterpiece of meta-commentary, balancing genuine scares with a razor-sharp script that pokes fun at the very rules it follows. While decades of imitators (and Scary Movie) have dulled its surprise factor, the opening scene is still legendary, and the cast is iconic. Essential viewing.
Details: Director: Wes Craven | Cast: Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox, David Arquette | Runtime: 1h 51m | Release Date: December 20, 1996
Best for: Everyone. Literally everyone. But especially fans of 90s nostalgia, whodunit mysteries, and anyone who wants to see where modern meta-horror began.
Worth noting: It might feel cliché if you watch it for the first time today, but that’s only because every slasher movie since 1996 has ripped it off.
Where to Watch: Stream on Max / Rent or Buy on Amazon.
⭐ Knockout Rating: 4.0 / 5
(Genre-defining classic)
Welcome to Knockout Horror. Today we are reviewing a modern classic slasher – Scream (1996).
Table of Contents
A genre changing horror hit
The movie we are looking at today transformed the entire face of horror back in the mid-90s. The world had suddenly turned its back on formulaic slashers. The appetite for ghouls and ghosts was at an all time low. The genre wasn’t just slumping, it was dying and bleeding out all over the floor. The entire industry needed a change.
Horror was desperate for a completely different, entirely more intelligent, and distinctly cooler edge. That edge came in the form of Wes Craven’s meta slasher Scream. The story follows high school student Sidney (Neve Campbell) and her friends. After the brutal murder of a fellow student and her boyfriend, rumours begin to spread that the killing was no mere coincidence.

There is a murderer stalking the town dressed in a frightening costume and he is determined to bring an entirely new type of fear to the town of Woodsboro. Sidney and her friends must use their knowledge of horror movies to survive the relentless attacks of the maniacal killer – Ghostface.
A slasher for a sceptical generation
Gen X were completely checked out on the type of horror movies they grew up with. They were a far more cynical bunch that chose to laugh at the tropes rather than embrace them. Gen X wasn’t about to settle for predictable plot twists and characters who felt generic and archetypal. They wanted something completely different and entirely more intelligent.
We saw the first hint of a change in the horror genre, not with a brand new IP but with an old one. The 1994 entry into the Nightmare on Elm Street series, Wes Craven’s New Nightmare (1994), was the first film that suggested that a monumental shift was on the horizon.
New Nightmare was extremely meta, self-aware, and entirely unafraid of chuckling at its tropey slasher heritage. It was a refreshing burst of colour for a genre that felt tired and out of ideas. It was also the movie that laid the groundwork for what was about to come. Things were about to change and in a major way.
The movie that changed horror forever
The advent of horror regaining its popularity truly came with 1996’s Scream. This wasn’t an ordinary slasher. Sure, it was trope heavy; the lead character was a virginal girl with a harrowing past, the killer was almost omnipresent, the kills were heavily projected. But it was incredibly aware of that fact and was about to turn it against the viewer.
“From the very opening scene where the movie’s assumed star, Drew Barrymore, is brutally slain… Scream was here to turn the genre on its head.”
From the very opening scene where the movie’s assumed star Drew Barrymore, is brutally slain to set up the story. Scream was here to turn the genre on its head and keep you guessing. If the most well known young actor in the cast who is front and centre on the poster is killed off in minutes, what else can you expect? It was all deliberate and used to create a brand new way of executing the overly formulaic and massively stale slasher film.

The characters here had their fingers on the pulse of horror movies and knew all the rules. “What’s the point? They’re all the same. Some stupid killer stalking some big-breasted girl who can’t act who is always running up the stairs when she should be running out the front door. It’s insulting!“. Quotes like these when Sidney is asked whether she likes scary movies demonstrated a level of self-awareness that was rare in the genre.
Scream was going to succeed by pointing out horror’s flaws and rolling its eyes at them. It would poke fun at its killers, chuckle at the cliches, and mock the rules. The victims were far from likely to just lay down and accept their fate.
It would play all your favourite hits before pulling the rug out from underneath you with some clever narrative misdirection, just when you thought you had it figured out. Scream felt fiendishly clever and ultra relevant; this was horror tailor made for Gen X who were increasingly sceptical and far less easy to please.
Still Cool, or Just a Bit… 90s?
So how does Scream hold up nearly 30 years later? Well, to be honest, it’s difficult to say. Released today, there’s no doubt this movie would attain a decent level of success. But its impact has been dulled by the myriad copies and multitude of sequels. It’s like throwing on a pair of jeans from the mid-90s.
“Scream is so deliberately tropey that it makes Scary Movie feel less like a parody and more like a one-to-one rip off with a few extra jokes.”
Sure, they were cool back then and people who were around at the time probably remember them fondly. But don’t expect showing them to your kids to result in anything other than sighs of embarrassment and a few eye-rolls.

Weirdly enough, the single biggest thing to dampen my enjoyment of this film was the fact that Scary Movie does such a good job lampooning it. Scream is so deliberately tropey that it makes Scary Movie feel less like a parody and more like a one-to-one rip off with a few extra jokes. Scream is a movie that was designed to be trend setting when it released.
Despite feeling extremely relevant and “cool” back in the mid-90s, that timeliness means it feels rather outdated now. The same thing that happened to slashers in the 80s that inspired this film’s plot has happened to the teen slasher in subsequent years.
So many of them rushed to feel current and meta that Scream now feels overly familiar. It’s something of a shame, really, because this is the film that started it all. Scream is responsible for reviving the slasher genre and giving birth to the popularity of the teen slasher genre itself.
How Scream Played (and Won) Its Own Game
Looking at this movie objectively, you can see why it succeeded. Given the context, it feels extremely clever in a really weird way. It doesn’t try to avoid the tropes that it is making fun of. In fact, it leans into them.
In some instances, the characters actually draw attention to how they are falling victim to typical slasher movie fare. A concept that is pretty daring when you think about it. In a lot of ways, it’s not all that inventive but the manner in which it uses said tropes to ultimately subvert expectation is pretty great.
“Craven knows that he isn’t going to be able to fool this audience with the same tricks that worked in the 80s. He actually uses their own awareness to subvert their expectations.”
Sidney, as a protagonist, is rather atypical in as much as she isn’t some busty bimbo. She is your usual virginal lead girl but she has reasons that go beyond simple virtue. She also goes through a level of growth that most characters like this simply don’t experience. Sidney is very aware of horror movie faux pas, as well; she isn’t going to run up the stairs, she is going to try to escape through the front door.

The rest of the cast are your typical teen horror staples. After all, Scream defined a lot of these tropes. They are all acutely aware of their place in the horror movie cycle and reference that constantly. Will they be victims? How would they react in a certain horror scenario? Would they fight back or play along? It’s interesting stuff and this is the real place where Scream succeeds. It has a lot of respect for the viewer.
Craven knows that he isn’t going to be able to fool this audience with the same tricks that worked in the 80s. They have grown up rolling their eyes at them. Instead, he acknowledges their awareness and crafts the kills and scares in a way that will surprise them. He actually uses their own awareness to subvert their expectations. It works extremely well, even if it is now over familiar to a modern audience.
A Cast That Was a Cut Above
Craven was a fantastic choice to direct Kevin Williamson’s story. He has such a natural feel for the slasher genre that he manages to set the movie up in a way that feels completely authentic. The suburban setting, the high school backdrop, the random parties. Scream feels like a traditional slasher movie which makes the subverting of expectation all the more effective.
The kills are predictable but a hell of a lot of fun. The victims here actually fight back, giving Ghostface a real run for his money on a number of occasions. You can tell that Craven didn’t want his villain to feel supernatural. This is an altogether more realistic and believable approach to horror.
The cast would all go on to tremendous success and they feel a cut above your standard teen slasher fare. Neve Campbell does a great job in the lead role. Rose McGowan has some strong moments as her best friend Tatum. Matthew Lillard is frequently a blast and Skeet Ulrich comes on strong later in the movie as Sidney’s boyfriend Billy.

Jamie Kennedy is a nice addition to the cast, too. His character acts as almost an avatar for the viewer. Deconstructing horror tropes through a lifetime of knowledge gained from indulging in pop culture. Courtney Cox, still at the height of her Friends fame, would create an iconic horror protagonist in the fierce Gale Weathers, as well.
The movie’s big reveal still works extremely well. Sure, hindsight is a bitch when it comes to horror but a lot of people didn’t see this coming. The movie hints at it so much that it almost seems too obvious but there’s enough narrative misdirection to keep it surprising.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- The Opening: Drew Barrymore’s scene is iconic for a reason. It sets the tone perfectly and remains shocking 30 years later.
- The Script: Kevin Williamson’s meta-commentary is sharp, funny, and incredibly smart. It respects the audience’s intelligence.
- The Cast: Matthew Lillard, Skeet Ulrich, and Jamie Kennedy are perfect archetypes. The chemistry is undeniable.
- The Legacy: It literally saved the horror genre from the doldrums of the mid-90s.
The Bad
- The Familiarity: It has been copied so many times that watching it now feels less revolutionary and more “standard.”
- The “Scary Movie” Effect: If you watched the parody first, it is genuinely hard to take some of the serious scenes in Scream seriously.
The Ugly: Nothing. It’s a stone-cold classic. Even if it feels a bit “90s” now, it still rules.
Should You Watch Scream?
Yes. Whether you are a horror veteran or a newcomer, Scream is required viewing. It is the bridge between the 80s slasher craze and modern horror. It’s funny, tense, and features one of the best third-act reveals in history. Even if the meta-humour isn’t as fresh as it was in 1996, it’s still a hell of a ride.
This review was part of our 31 Days of Halloween 2025 Marathon. Check out the full category for more recommendations.
You might also like:
- The Haunting of Julia Fields Review – A Convoluted Paranormal Mess
- Primate (2025) Ending Explained – Nature Bites Back
- The Deep House (2021) Review – An Underwater Haunted House Horror
- Suburban Nightmares – 10 Essential Small Town Horror Movies
- The Taking of Deborah Logan Review – A Tragic and Visceral Possession Tale
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.






