Brightburn (2019) Review – A Visceral and Mean-Spirited Superhero Slasher
Brightburn: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A masterfully mean-spirited and viscerally aggressive subversion of the “superhero origin” trope that successfully blends cosmic power with slasher-style dread. Brightburn (2019) succeeds by leaning into its own nihilism, offering a terrifying answer to the question of what happens when an unstoppable alien lacks a moral compass. David Yarovesky’s direction is punchy and unapologetic, delivering some of the most graphic and creative kills in contemporary studio horror. Elizabeth Banks provides a necessary emotional anchor, portraying a mother’s blind devotion with a vulnerability that grounds the more outlandish sci-fi elements. This 3.0 star effort is a stylish, brutal exercise in genre-blending that prioritises shock value over deep character study. It is a loud, explosive, and profoundly bleak study of divinity without humanity. It is essential viewing for fans of ‘Evil Superman’ narratives.
Details: Director: David Yarovesky | Cast: Elizabeth Banks, David Denman, Jackson A. Dunn | Runtime: 1h 30m | Release Date: 2019
Best for: Fans of gory slashers, superhero subversions, and those who enjoy “nature vs nurture” horror themes with high production values.
Worth noting: Produced by James Gunn, the film acts as a dark companion piece to his earlier superhero explorations like Super and Guardians of the Galaxy.
Where to Watch: Netflix, Tubi, Amazon🛒
Rating: 3.0/5 Stars
(A masterfully gory and stylistically bold reimagining of the superhero mythos that delivers a series of visceral slasher kills, despite suffering from a thin plot and rushed character development.)
Welcome to Knockout Horror. Today we are checking out the twisted take on the superhero genre from James Gunn – Brightburn.
Highlights
Not so Superman
Brightburn focuses on the Breyer family; Mum Tori (Elizabeth Banks), Dad Kyle (David Denman), and son Brandon (Jackson A. Dunn). Brandon isn’t actually the blood child of Tori and Kyle, they found him in the woods after a strange encounter. As he grows older, it appears he is a little different. As he struggles with those around him, he begins to develop strange powers and, along with it, a horrific desire to harm people. This places the couple in a battle between protecting the son they love and protecting the world from his cruelty.
“Brightburn actually feels like a horror movie. In fact, at times, it borders on almost slasher levels of violence. It is extremely bloody, fairly tense, and the kills are up there with some of the champions of Gorno.”
We may as well get this out of the way early in the review. Many people are talking about Brightburn as if it’s the first horror movie to ever flip the superhero formula on its head. It’s not, 2012’s Chronicle which is based around a similar premise. The big question here isn’t whether it is wholly original but whether Brightburn does it better.
There’s a lot of differences, this is a child, Chronicle featured teens etc etc but they feel similar. The one area I would say that they differ is that Brightburn actually feels like a horror movie. In fact, at times, it borders on almost slasher levels of violence. It is extremely bloody, fairly tense, and the kills are up there with some of the champions of Gorno.
It’s not just the kills that give away Brightburn’s horror leanings, though. The tension in many of the scenes is really effective, with Brandon Breyer proving to be a capable, unstoppable, killer ala Jason or Mike Myers.
His impressive lack of empathy genuinely has you questioning what he will do next and to whom. This is an actual horror whereas Chronicle is more of a drama heavy thriller. Chronicle is still the better superhero gone rogue movie, though.
A different kind of superhero movie
I have to be honest, I am not the biggest fan of superhero movies. In fact, I will go out of my way to avoid them wherever possible. With that being said, I find the idea of a “superhero turned villain” story quite interesting. After all, the bad guys are always the most interesting characters, right?
Brightburn taps into the “Superhero gone bad” idea in much the same way that Chronicle did but without the good guy superheroes to act as a counter balance. This is a story that is far more focused on the emergence of a villain that has purely bad intentions.
Brandon is pretty intimidating, too, despite is diminutive stature. He is an alien from another planet and something that earth is evidently not prepared for. You would typically expect him to have some form of weakness; a Kryptonite if you will, and he does but it doesn’t play into the plot in the way you might think.
“Brightburn is not afraid to stay away from the cookie cutter elements that usually plague this type of horror movie and it may surprise you with the direction it takes at key moments.”
Brightburn is not afraid to stay away from the cookie cutter elements that usually plague this type of horror movie and it may surprise you with the direction it takes at key moments. With that being said, there are problems and they are pretty damn significant. Brightburn, as a movie, is far from perfect.
It has a few issues
As a simple horror with a science fiction based theme, some serious slasher elements, a different kind of villain, and tons of gore, Brightburn can be fun. As a production, there are elements that are severely lacking. The first thing worthy of note is the writing of Brian and Mark Gunn which can really leave you wanting.
Character development is a particular area of weakness. Brandon goes from being a lovable kid without a bad bone in his body to being the very epitome of evil pretty much overnight. The things that happen to him are not really sufficient reason for him taking out his anger on the world in such a way. If he is just like this by design then a little more elaborating would have gone a long way to helping us understand the character.
“It’s a fun, gory ride. It’s flawed and a bit messy, but the kills alone make it worth a watch for horror fans looking to kill 90 minutes. Just don’t expect a masterpiece.”
We never really get into Brandon’s head, we are just observers of his actions. A lot more character development would have been very welcome. Brightburn’s characters are also very one dimensional. Relationships are barely expanded upon and characters are essentially set up like bowling pins purely to be knocked down by our pre-pubescent, red eyed bowling ball. You don’t care about the characters and that impacts the overall weight and significance of the events.
It almost feels unfinished
Some of the reactions of the residents of Brightburn are just ridiculous, as well. Characters come across as stupid and, in some instances, completely blind to what is going on. Couple this with some of Brandon’s actions making little to no sense and you have a pretty confused narrative. Was Brightburn built downwind of a nuclear testing site? Everyone seems a little simple.
I feel as though there were a fair few scenes left on the cutting room floor that probably expanded on things a lot. It all just feels so damn loosely put together. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a 2 hour long director’s cut at some point in the future (this obviously never happened). I would definitely be interested in watching a version that goes into a little more detail on the events.
Acting and Cinematography
Cinematography was pretty good, nothing spectacular. There were some nice night-time shots in the barn. I felt as though some of the weird post production effects were unnecessary, though. Things flying at the screen and what not; it looked pretty bad and reminded me of a mid 2000s 3D movie.
“Jackson A. Dunn was really good as Brandon. I really loved the way he portrayed a lack of empathy, and he had some excellent facial expressions when his mood switched in certain scenes.”
Acting was good for the most part. Elizabeth Banks is always great and it makes a change to see her in a leading role. She always seems to be a co-star despite having the presence and unique looks to be a leading lady in Hollywood. She was very believable as a loving mother and wife that just wanted the best for her family.
Jackson A. Dunn was really good as Brandon. This is the type of role that often goes to kids who are just naturally a bit strange or quirky. “Better Watch Out’s” Levi Miller is a pretty good example of this, as is Ezra Miller in “We Need to Talk About Kevin”. Jackson A. Dunn actually just seems like a normal kid who is acting and he does a great job. I really loved the way he portrayed a lack of empathy and he had some excellent facial expressions when his mood switched in certain scenes.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Visceral Kills: The film is surprisingly graphic, delivering slasher-level gore that elevates the tension and satisfies hardcore horror fans.
- Jackson A. Dunn: Gives a chillingly detached performance, effectively capturing the transition from a normal child to an alien predator without conscience.
- Creative Concept: The “Evil Superman” premise is handled with a genuine commitment to horror, making Brandon feel like an unstoppable force of nature.
The Bad
- Weak Writing: The narrative lacks depth, with character motivations and relationships receiving very little development before the carnage begins.
- Rushed Pacing: Brandon’s shift to absolute evil happens almost overnight, feeling more like a plot requirement than a natural progression.
- Internal Logic: The supporting characters often make baffling decisions or ignore massive red flags to keep the thin story moving forward.
The Ugly: The “Eye” Sequence. A moment of body horror so cringeworthy and visceral it effectively cements the film’s status as a true horror effort.
Should You Watch Brightburn?
Yes. It is a 3.0 star film that provides a fun, albeit shallow, twist on two established genres. If you value high-quality practical effects and a mean-spirited tone over complex storytelling, Brightburn delivers exactly what it promises. While it doesn’t reach the narrative heights of Chronicle, its commitment to being a “super-powered slasher” makes it a solid watch for an evening. It is an intelligent, technical curiosity that prioritises gore over substance. It is a brutal ride.
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.










