Jack Frost (1997) Review – A Deliberately Dreadful and Boring Cult Shocker
Jack Frost: Quick Verdict
The Verdict: A cynical and aggressively self-aware horror comedy that mistakes “being intentionally bad” for being genuinely entertaining. Jack Frost attempts to court cult status by leaning into bottom-tier practical effects and eye-rolling puns, but the result is a tedious slog that lacks the charm of accidental failures. While the late Christopher Allport and a debut Shannon Elizabeth try their best to navigate the farcical script, the film is hampered by repetitive gags and a narrative that feels like a low-effort joke. Unlike the genuine gems of the “so-bad-it’s-good” genre, this production is far too cognisant of its own shortcomings to be truly funny. This 1.5 star effort is a boring, poorly paced, and ultimately empty experience that prioritises “winks” to the audience over actual creativity. It is a movie that aimed for a legacy of ironic appreciation and unfortunately found it. For those seeking actual festive fun or unintended hilarity, there are far better options in the holiday horror sub-genre. This is one winter nightmare that is best left to melt in the sun.
Details: Director: Michael Cooney | Cast: Christopher Allport, Stephen Mendel, F. William Parker, Shannon Elizabeth | Runtime: 1h 29m | Release Date: 1997
Best for: Viewers who enjoy ultra-low-budget “bad movie nights” and don’t mind when a film is clearly in on the joke.
Worth noting: The film used massive amounts of foam and cotton wool to simulate snow because the production took place during an unusually warm December.
Where to Watch: Tubi (Free), Amazon🛒, VOD
Rating: 1.5/5 Stars
(A deliberately shoddy and self-aware holiday horror that prioritises being “in on the joke” over actual entertainment, resulting in a tedious and uninspired cult dud.)
Welcome to Knockout Horror. Today we are reviewing cult classic Jack Frost (1997).
Highlights
A cult classic… for some reason?
Having seen Jack Frost at least a few times, I can honestly say it is one of the worst movies I have ever watched. Featuring Michael Keaton coming back from the dead as a massive, terrifying animatronic snowman. He brutally assaults a bunch of kids using rocks hidden in snowballs, scares a snowplow driver to death, and relentlessly harasses his grieving son… wait, wrong movie.
“Jack Frost is an equally bad horror film about a serial killer who happens to be resurrected as a snowman. Desperate for revenge, he sets out on an ice cold killing spree.”
This is an equally bad horror film about a serial killer who happens to be resurrected as a snowman. Desperate for revenge, he sets out on an ice cold killing spree in the local community.
This movie is rather popular and considered a cult classic. The reasons given are the silliness, bad acting, terrible effects, kill scenes, and wise cracks. It’s your standard “so-bad-it’s-good” fare. Honestly, I just don’t get it. I am a huge fan of horror that is so bad it is good. I just don’t think Jack Frost fits the bill. In a nutshell, it is trying too hard.
But so bad it’s good? Not really!
I will preface the following by saying this: I grew up with shit like Rabid Grannies and Ghoulies. For a while, movies like that were all I knew. It was practically all that my local video shop had in to rent at an affordable price. I spent many an afternoon flicking through the bargain bin of terrible horror to plan a night of viewing. I adore movies like this and go out of my way to watch them.
With that in mind, I was so amped to watch but, by the time Jack Frost was done, I felt tired, bored, and hugely disappointed. Sure, it is bad. In fact, it is very bad. The thing is however, it is acutely aware of how bad it is. It knows it sucks and there isn’t a single scene delivered without this deliberate intent. Movies that are so bad they are good are rarely this self-aware. The makers of Jack Frost definitely knew what they were doing.
“Jack Frost is acutely aware of how bad it is. It knows it sucks and there isn’t a single scene delivered without this deliberate intent. This movie is a joke and it is very aware of that fact.”
If anything, I would say they were deliberately aiming for a cult following. Dialogue is so ridiculous and camera shots so poor that it has to be on purpose. The rubber model of Jack Frost is terrible. One second of seeing that on set would be enough to know exactly the type of film you are making. This film is a joke and it is very aware of that fact. The difference is, people who buy into it and make it a cult classic are the punchline. This isn’t Leprechaun. This isn’t Jason X. It is a movie that aimed for this exact type of reception and got it.
So bad it’s bad
My particular issue with Jack Frost is that it isn’t “So good it’s Bad”; it is just bad. Jack Frost isn’t unintentionally funny; it is just not a very good movie. I never once felt as though I was watching something that wanted to be decent. At least with movies like Jason X you can tell that there was an intention to make a good movie. That’s what makes bad films good. Jack Frost feels more like a money laundering project. It is incredibly low effort and designed to be silly and farcical. It is almost too self-aware to be watchable.
On top of that, Jack Frost is boring and an absolute chore to get through. It is cheap looking, but not to the point where you really notice. Lines are delivered deadpan in a manner that is almost accompanied by a wink to the audience. Jack’s kill scenes are deliberately ridiculous. Wise cracks are uttered desperately hoping to stick in people’s heads for their silliness. All the while the plot drags on with only a few kills and a few boring false endings.
“It has built up a cult following on the back of nothing. It’s very try-hard, unfunny, dull, and a bit of a chore to watch. It is, simply, so bad it’s bad.”
People are rolling up onto user review sites giving this movie 8s, 9s, and 10s. They seem to believe they are in on the joke. They get it, they appreciate the winks to the audience. Haters must be idiots for not realising that this film is supposed to be silly. Apparently people who dislike it just don’t get it. As much as some people think it is, as much as it wants to be, for me, Jack Frost ain’t it!
The actors play it fairly straight
Acting here is delivered pretty straight faced for the most part. Sam, played by the late Christopher Allport, gets most of the screen time. Allport plays the role with a keen sense of the kind of film being made. Well aware of the silly nature of the production, he is mostly serious but always ready to ham it up.
Costars are similarly cognisant of the non-serious nature of the film and play to type. This was Shannon Elizabeth‘s first role. I applaud her for being enthusiastic enough to share a sex scene with a large rubber snowman. Some of her more salacious scenes in American Pie must have seemed like a breeze compared to this.
Cinematography is, honestly, okay for a low budget movie. It is about what you would expect for a late 90s straight-to-video film. Set design is okay. A warm December put paid to the idea of real snow. The filmmakers had to bring in foam and cotton wool. To be honest, it works better given the type of movie this is. If you are going to make a deliberately crap movie, may as well fully commit to it.
Effects are bloody awful but, again, this is deliberate. The producers of Jack Frost knew exactly what they were doing. I think if you offered them a realistic looking snowman and a competent effects team they would have told you to sit and spin. This is a movie very much made for fans of so-bad-it’s-good horror.
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Good
- Christopher Allport: Leads the cast with a straight-faced commitment that provides the film with its only shred of professional dignity.
- Creative Concept: The basic idea of a “Killer Snowman” is a fun hook that, in more capable hands, could have made for a genuine holiday horror staple.
- Technical Competence: Despite the intentional “badness,” the actual cinematography and lighting are decent enough for a straight-to-video 90s release.
The Bad
- Aggressive Self-Awareness: The film tries too hard to be “cult,” which drains the humour out of the bad effects and silly dialogue.
- Boring Pacing: Long stretches of the film are devoid of kills or action, leaving the viewer to sit through repetitive and uninspired banter.
- Terrible Effects: The rubber snowman is objectively awful, and while the makers knew this, it doesn’t stop the visual from becoming gratingly cheap.
The Ugly: The “Bath” Scene. A scene so notorious and ridiculous that it serves as the ultimate example of the film’s “try-hard” attempt at cult infamy.
Should You Watch Jack Frost?
No. It is a 1.5 star film that simply isn’t worth the commitment. While some find the intentional silliness charming, most will find it to be a tedious and cynical exercise in low-effort filmmaking. If you want a bad horror movie that is actually fun, stick to the classics that were trying to be good. This one is simply too cold to enjoy.
Our Scoring Philosophy: A Fair Fight
Horror is a genre that thrives thanks to indie film makers and low budget creators. At Knockout Horror, we firmly believe that every movie that we review deserves a fair fight. That's why we grade on a curve. Our star ratings are all about context, judging a film on what it achieves with the resources it has.
A 4-star rating for a scrappy indie horror made for $10,000 is a testament to its ingenuity and raw power. A 4-star rating for a $100 million blockbuster means it delivered on its epic promises. We don't compare them side-by-side; we celebrate success in every weight class, from the back-alley brawler to the heavyweight champion. Please keep this in mind when considering star ratings.
Support the Site Knockout Horror is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Basically, if you click a link to rent or buy a movie, we may earn a tiny commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This helps keep the lights on and the nightmares coming. Don't worry, we will never recommend a movie purely to generate clicks. If it's bad, we will tell you.
Disclaimer: Images, posters, and video stills used in this review are the property of their respective copyright holders. They are included here for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and review under fair use. Knockout Horror makes no claim of ownership and encourages readers to support the official release of all films discussed.
